IN DEFENSE OF FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH IN MEDICAL ETHICS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DABAGH S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Public Health Year:2008 | Volume:37 | Issue:1(SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE ON BIOETHICS) Page(s): 31-38

Download Full-Text

View:

362

Download:

209

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN DEFENSE OF FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH IN MEDICAL ETHICS

Author(s)

DABAGH S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PARTICULARISM

PRINCIPLISM

MORALLY RELEVANT FEATURE

FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH

Abstract

Principlism, in general and FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH in particular is largely discussed in current medical ethics. According to PRINCIPLISM, the ethical relationship between physician and patient has to be categorized based on some principles, the principles which are general, action-guiding and could help both the patient and the physician to arrange their ethical behavior. FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH which is a principlistic view, has formulated the principles which have to be considered in medical ethics in the light of Rossian ethical framework as follows: respect for autonomy, nonmaleficience, beneficence and justice. Ethical PARTICULARISM, on the other hand, strongly criticizes PRINCIPLISM and repudiates the very idea of generalizability in the realm of ethics. According to particularists, the way in which a MORALLY RELEVANT FEATURE like fidelity and justice behave in different ethical occasions is fully context-dependent so that they cannot be patternable in advance. It follows from this that fidelity, for instance, is not a good-making feature, generally speaking.In this paper, firstly, the Rossian ethics is discussed in order to make FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH intelligible. Secondly, the main particularists' argument against PRINCIPLISM is formulated. Finally, Particularists' argument is evaluated and its plausibility is discussed.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

DABAGH, S.. (2008). IN DEFENSE OF FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH IN MEDICAL ETHICS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 37(1(SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE ON BIOETHICS)), 31-38. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/272494/en

Vancouver: Copy

DABAGH S.. IN DEFENSE OF FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH IN MEDICAL ETHICS. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH[Internet]. 2008;37(1(SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE ON BIOETHICS)):31-38. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/272494/en

IEEE: Copy

S. DABAGH, “IN DEFENSE OF FOUR PRINCIPLES APPROACH IN MEDICAL ETHICS,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, vol. 37, no. 1(SUPPLEMENTARY ISSUE ON BIOETHICS), pp. 31–38, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/272494/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops