SOFT POSTERIOR CANAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIORLY BASED MUSCULOPERIOSTEAL FLAP

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SADOUGHI M.; BARADARANFAR M.H.; DOUDANGEH F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ACTA MEDICA IRANICA Year:2006 | Volume:44 | Issue:6 Page(s): 387-390

Download Full-Text

View:

423

Download:

118

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SOFT POSTERIOR CANAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIORLY BASED MUSCULOPERIOSTEAL FLAP

Author(s)

SADOUGHI M. | BARADARANFAR M.H. | DOUDANGEH F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

RADICAL MASTOIDECTOMY

SOFT POSTERIOR WALL

MASTOID RECONSTRUCTION

Abstract

This study was designed reevaluate the outcome of soft wall reconstruction technique for CWD mastoidectomy and to test the validity of anteriorly–based musculoperiosteal flap attachment without oblitrating the mastoid cavity for increasing graft viability. Two methods of reconstruction were used. Soft wall reconstruction method as described previously by Smith et al, were performed on 35 patients (A), and anteriorly – based musculoperiosteal flap was attached to it in 25 patients (B). Post operative condition of meatal wall, graft failure and canal volume in two groups were documented. In 3 years follow up period no retraction pockets were documented and there was slight increase in canal volume measured by the volume of povidone iodine pouring in the canal. 17% of group A and 8% of group B had graft failure. No significant differences were seen (P > 0.05). There was no recurrent cholesteatoma in the patients on clinical examination. Soft-wall reconstruction method is a safe method for eliminating the problem of radicalized mastoid cavity, and the musculoperiosteal flap attachment had no advantage compared with soft-wall reconstruction.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SADOUGHI, M., BARADARANFAR, M.H., & DOUDANGEH, F.. (2006). SOFT POSTERIOR CANAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIORLY BASED MUSCULOPERIOSTEAL FLAP. ACTA MEDICA IRANICA, 44(6), 387-390. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/277961/en

Vancouver: Copy

SADOUGHI M., BARADARANFAR M.H., DOUDANGEH F.. SOFT POSTERIOR CANAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIORLY BASED MUSCULOPERIOSTEAL FLAP. ACTA MEDICA IRANICA[Internet]. 2006;44(6):387-390. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/277961/en

IEEE: Copy

M. SADOUGHI, M.H. BARADARANFAR, and F. DOUDANGEH, “SOFT POSTERIOR CANAL WALL RECONSTRUCTION WITH AND WITHOUT ANTERIORLY BASED MUSCULOPERIOSTEAL FLAP,” ACTA MEDICA IRANICA, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 387–390, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/277961/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops