INTRAVAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR: LETTER TO EDITOR

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JALILIAN NASRIN; FAKHERI TARAVAT; GHADAMI MOHAMMAD RASOUL

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: ACTA MEDICA IRANICA Year:2011 | Volume:49 | Issue:12 Page(s): 0-0

Download Full-Text

View:

355

Download:

102

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

INTRAVAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR: LETTER TO EDITOR

Author(s)

JALILIAN NASRIN | FAKHERI TARAVAT | GHADAMI MOHAMMAD RASOUL | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Dear Editors: We report the findings of a small prospective randomly allocated trial in which we compared the efficacy of intravaginal dinoprostone to transcervical Foley catheter for induction of labor. Women who were admitted to the delivery suite for labor induction and met criteria for enrolment in the trial were invited to participate. Among those, 20 received vaginal dinoprostone and Foley catheter was used for cervical ripening in 20 women. Inclusion criteria were singleton gestation, cephalic presentation, reactive fetal heart rate (FHR) pattern, intact membranes and gestational age between 37-41 weeks. Exclusion criteria were Bishop Score at least 7 or cervical dilatation greater than 3 cm, ultrasonographically estimated fetal weight greater than 4500 g or less than 2000 g, evidence of cephalopelvic disproportion, placenta previa or unexplained vaginal bleeding, previous section cesarean or uterine surgery and contraindications to prostaglandins.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JALILIAN, NASRIN, FAKHERI, TARAVAT, & GHADAMI, MOHAMMAD RASOUL. (2011). INTRAVAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR: LETTER TO EDITOR. ACTA MEDICA IRANICA, 49(12), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/278566/en

Vancouver: Copy

JALILIAN NASRIN, FAKHERI TARAVAT, GHADAMI MOHAMMAD RASOUL. INTRAVAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR: LETTER TO EDITOR. ACTA MEDICA IRANICA[Internet]. 2011;49(12):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/278566/en

IEEE: Copy

NASRIN JALILIAN, TARAVAT FAKHERI, and MOHAMMAD RASOUL GHADAMI, “INTRAVAGINAL DINOPROSTONE VERSUS INTRA CERVICAL FOLEY CATHETER FOR INDUCTION OF LABOR: LETTER TO EDITOR,” ACTA MEDICA IRANICA, vol. 49, no. 12, pp. 0–0, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/278566/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops