مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

361
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

318
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

QUALITY OF REPORTS ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS PUBLISHED IN IRANIAN JOURNALS: APPLICATION OF THE NEW VERSION OF CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT)

Pages

  20-22

Abstract

 Background: The Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials (CONSORT) statement is a device to standardize reporting and improve the quality of CONTROLLED TRIALS. The aim of this study is to determine the quality of controlled clinical trial reports by national peerreviewed journals in Iran.Methods: In a cross-sectional study, we evaluated clinical trial reports by national peer-reviewed Iranian journals between 2008 and 2010 by CONSORT2010. The sample was selected from Iran Medex. The proportion of adherence to each item of the CONSORT checklist was assessed for each clinical trial. The reliability of evaluation by reviewers was calculated by Pearson correlation coefficient, and was determined to be 0.73-0.89, with a significance level of P<0.01 between reviewers.Results: A total of 509 articles published in 80 peer-reviewed national journals were evaluated. The average adherence of evaluated randomized CONTROLLED TRIALS (RCTs) to the 37 items of the CONSORT STATEMENT was 43.8%. The mean CONSORT score significantly differed across each year of publication. None of the articles mentioned the location where the full trial protocol could be accessed.Conclusion: The quality of reporting RCTs published in national PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS needs significant improvement as the majority did not adhere to CONSORT guidelines. It is necessary for the editors of Iranian journals to consider CONSORT criteria for evaluation of all future RCTs.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NOJOUMI, MARZIEH, RAMEZANI, MOJDEH, & GHAFARI ANVAR, AMINEH. (2013). QUALITY OF REPORTS ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS PUBLISHED IN IRANIAN JOURNALS: APPLICATION OF THE NEW VERSION OF CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT). ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 16(1), 20-22. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/280894/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NOJOUMI MARZIEH, RAMEZANI MOJDEH, GHAFARI ANVAR AMINEH. QUALITY OF REPORTS ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS PUBLISHED IN IRANIAN JOURNALS: APPLICATION OF THE NEW VERSION OF CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT). ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2013;16(1):20-22. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/280894/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MARZIEH NOJOUMI, MOJDEH RAMEZANI, and AMINEH GHAFARI ANVAR, “QUALITY OF REPORTS ON RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS PUBLISHED IN IRANIAN JOURNALS: APPLICATION OF THE NEW VERSION OF CONSOLIDATED STANDARDS OF REPORTING TRIALS (CONSORT),” ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 20–22, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/280894/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button