مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

227
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

78
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HOW TO ASSESS QUALITY OF RESEARCH IN IRAN, FROM INPUT TO IMPACT? INTRODUCTION OF PEER-BASED RESEARCH EVALUATION MODEL IN IRAN

Pages

  680-685

Abstract

 Background: RESEARCH EVALUATION is a systematic and objective process to measure relevance, efficiency and effectiveness of RESEARCH activities, and PEER REVIEW is one of the most important tools for assessing quality of RESEARCH. The aim of this study was introducing RESEARCH EVALUATION indicators based on PEER REVIEWing. Methods: This study was implemented in 4 stages. A list of objective-oriented EVALUATION indicators were designed in 4 axes, including; governance and leadership, structure, knowledge production and RESEARCH impact. Results: The top 10% medical sciences RESEARCH centers (RCs) were evaluated based on PEER REVIEW. Adequate equipment and laboratory instruments, high quality RESEARCH publication and national or international cooperation were the main strengths in medical sciences RCs and the most important weaknesses included failure to adhere to strategic plans, parallel actions in similar fields, problems in manpower recruitment, knowledge translation & exchange (KTE) in service providers and policy makers’ levels. Conclusion: PEER REVIEW EVALUATION can improve the quality of RESEARCH.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    EBADIFAR, ASGHAR, BARADARAN EFTEKHARI, MONIR, OWLI, PARVIZ, HABIBI, ELHAM, GHALENOEE, ELHAM, BAGHERI, MOHAMMAD REZA, FALAHAT, KATAYOUN, ELTEMASI, MASOUMEH, SOBHANI, ZAHRA, & AKHONDZADEH, SHAHIN. (2017). HOW TO ASSESS QUALITY OF RESEARCH IN IRAN, FROM INPUT TO IMPACT? INTRODUCTION OF PEER-BASED RESEARCH EVALUATION MODEL IN IRAN. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 20(11), 680-685. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/281615/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    EBADIFAR ASGHAR, BARADARAN EFTEKHARI MONIR, OWLI PARVIZ, HABIBI ELHAM, GHALENOEE ELHAM, BAGHERI MOHAMMAD REZA, FALAHAT KATAYOUN, ELTEMASI MASOUMEH, SOBHANI ZAHRA, AKHONDZADEH SHAHIN. HOW TO ASSESS QUALITY OF RESEARCH IN IRAN, FROM INPUT TO IMPACT? INTRODUCTION OF PEER-BASED RESEARCH EVALUATION MODEL IN IRAN. ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE[Internet]. 2017;20(11):680-685. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/281615/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ASGHAR EBADIFAR, MONIR BARADARAN EFTEKHARI, PARVIZ OWLI, ELHAM HABIBI, ELHAM GHALENOEE, MOHAMMAD REZA BAGHERI, KATAYOUN FALAHAT, MASOUMEH ELTEMASI, ZAHRA SOBHANI, and SHAHIN AKHONDZADEH, “HOW TO ASSESS QUALITY OF RESEARCH IN IRAN, FROM INPUT TO IMPACT? INTRODUCTION OF PEER-BASED RESEARCH EVALUATION MODEL IN IRAN,” ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, vol. 20, no. 11, pp. 680–685, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/281615/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button