COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPY AND LAPAROTOMY IN 112 WOMEN UNDERGOING TUBAL LIGATION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AREFI S.S.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Reproduction & Infertility Year:2000 | Volume:1 | Issue:4 (4) Page(s): 27-32

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,317

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPY AND LAPAROTOMY IN 112 WOMEN UNDERGOING TUBAL LIGATION

Author(s)

AREFI S.S. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

TUBAL LIGATIONQ3

LAPAROSCOPYQ4

POMEROYQ4

LAPARATOMYQ4

CLIPSQ4

CAUTERIZATIONQ4

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, effective ness and the ideal method of TUBAL LIGATION with low complication, low bleeding and early recovery. In this investigation we compared the early complications and the quality of operations in two different tubul ligation techniques on totally 112 women who were operated in two centers in Tehran, Iran; In one group (53 women) TUBAL LIGATION was carried out by LAPAROSCOPY (with CLIPS and cautery, whereas the other group (59 women) was operated using POMEROY technique in laparotomy. Collection of information was done using question are and case selection and grouping was performed randomly.The results showed that the duration of operation and hospitalization as well as the amount of bleeding were less in LAPAROSCOPY group than in LAPARATOMY group (P<0.05). Moreover, women in LAPAROSCOPY group could completely retain their activity more rapidly than the other group. Hematoma and infection were only slightly higher in patients in LAPARATOMY group (P>0.05), whereas pain occurred more aften in the LAPARATOMY group (P<0.05).It can be concluded that complications occur less often in the LAPAROSCOPY group in comparison with lapartony group and TUBAL LIGATION with LAPAROSCOPY can be considered as a better and safer method.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

AREFI, S.S.. (2000). COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPY AND LAPAROTOMY IN 112 WOMEN UNDERGOING TUBAL LIGATION. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY, 1(4 (4)), 27-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28404/en

Vancouver: Copy

AREFI S.S.. COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPY AND LAPAROTOMY IN 112 WOMEN UNDERGOING TUBAL LIGATION. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2000;1(4 (4)):27-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28404/en

IEEE: Copy

S.S. AREFI, “COMPARISON OF QUALITY AND EARLY POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS BETWEEN LAPAROSCOPY AND LAPAROTOMY IN 112 WOMEN UNDERGOING TUBAL LIGATION,” JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY, vol. 1, no. 4 (4), pp. 27–32, 2000, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28404/en

Related Journal Papers