COMPARISON OF HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE ABNORMALITIES IN INFERTILE WOMEN

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ZEYNALZADEH MAHTAB; NAZARI T.; BALEGGI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Reproduction & Infertility Year:2002 | Volume:3 | Issue:4 (12) Page(s): 29-35

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,988

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE ABNORMALITIES IN INFERTILE WOMEN

Author(s)

ZEYNALZADEH MAHTAB | NAZARI T. | BALEGGI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

INFERTILITYQ2

HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHYQ4

HYSTEROSONOGRAPHYQ4

HYSTROSCOPY AND NTRAUTERINE ABNORMALLYQ4

Abstract

Uterine abnormalities are found in approximately 34-62% of infertile women. Because of this relatively high prevalence of uterine abnormalities, evaluation of uterine cavity is performed in the primary evaluation of INFERTILITY. The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY with that of HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY for the evaluation of abnormalities of uterine cavity of infertile women. Sixty six infertile women were prospectively evaluated with hysterosalpangiogram (HSG) and hysterosonogram (H/S) as a part of their INFERTILITY workup. The result of each examination was compared with what was obtained by hysteroscopy as a golden standard. The results of H/S agreed with hysteroscopy in 95.5% (K=0.86) while HSG agreed with hysteroscopy in 87.9% (K=0.64) of cases. Sensitivity of H/S was 85.7% and its specificity 98.1%, while sensitivity of HSG was 71.4% and its specificity 92.3%. HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY was in general more accurate test and appeared to be an acceptable first-line evaluation for intrauterine structure. We recommend use of HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY as a noninvasive, easy, inexpensive, effective and well-tolerated method of investigating the intrauterine cavity in infertile women instead of HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY.

Cites

SURVEY OF THE LEVEL OF CONCORDANCE BETWEEN HSG HYSTEROSALPIGOGRAPHY AND LAPAROSCOPY IN DIAGNOSIS OF TUBO-PERITONEAL FACTORS IN INFERTILE WOMEN

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ZEYNALZADEH, MAHTAB, NAZARI, T., & BALEGGI, M.. (2002). COMPARISON OF HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE ABNORMALITIES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY, 3(4 (12)), 29-35. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28512/en

Vancouver: Copy

ZEYNALZADEH MAHTAB, NAZARI T., BALEGGI M.. COMPARISON OF HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE ABNORMALITIES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2002;3(4 (12)):29-35. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28512/en

IEEE: Copy

MAHTAB ZEYNALZADEH, T. NAZARI, and M. BALEGGI, “COMPARISON OF HYSTEROSONOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSALPANGIOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF INTRAUTERINE ABNORMALITIES IN INFERTILE WOMEN,” JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION AND INFERTILITY, vol. 3, no. 4 (12), pp. 29–35, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28512/en

Related Journal Papers