ILIZAROV VERSUS AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF TIBIA OPEN FRACTURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESMAEILNEJAD GANJI SEYED MOKHTAR; BAHRAMI M.; JOUKAR F.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Red Crescent Medical Journal Year:2011 | Volume:13 | Issue:12 Page(s): 868-872

Download Full-Text

View:

435

Download:

161

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

ILIZAROV VERSUS AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF TIBIA OPEN FRACTURES

Author(s)

ESMAEILNEJAD GANJI SEYED MOKHTAR | BAHRAMI M. | JOUKAR F. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FRACTURE

TIBIA

OPEN

ILIZARO

AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR

TREATMENT

Abstract

Background: In developing countries, ILIZAROv or AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR is usually used for TREATMENT of TIBIAl OPEN FRACTUREs. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of these two methods for TREATMENT of TIBIAl OPEN FRACTUREs.Methods: From April 2002 to April 2010, 120 patients with OPEN TIBIAl FRACTUREs admitted to the Department of Orthopedics of Babol University of Medical Sciences entered this study. In each arm, 60 subjects randomly received ILIZAROv or AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR. All patients were followed at least for one year. These two groups were compared regarding non-union, malunion and cure rates.Results: The mean age of the patients in ILIZAROv group was 32.35±11.28 and for AO were 31.3±10.99 years. Mean time for union in ILIZAROv group was 5.25±1.85 and for AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR was 5.85±2.13 months. Nonunion rate in ILIZAROv group was 10% and for AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR was 11.7%. Malunion rate in ILIZAROv group was 10% and for AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR was 18.3%. Totally, efficacy of TREATMENT in the ILIZAROv group was 81.7% and in AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR was 65%.Conclusion: The efficacy of TREATMENT in ILIZAROv was higher than that AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR in TREATMENT of OPEN TIBIAl FRACTUREs.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ESMAEILNEJAD GANJI, SEYED MOKHTAR, BAHRAMI, M., & JOUKAR, F.. (2011). ILIZAROV VERSUS AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF TIBIA OPEN FRACTURES. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), 13(12), 868-872. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/292498/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESMAEILNEJAD GANJI SEYED MOKHTAR, BAHRAMI M., JOUKAR F.. ILIZAROV VERSUS AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF TIBIA OPEN FRACTURES. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ)[Internet]. 2011;13(12):868-872. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/292498/en

IEEE: Copy

SEYED MOKHTAR ESMAEILNEJAD GANJI, M. BAHRAMI, and F. JOUKAR, “ILIZAROV VERSUS AO EXTERNAL FIXATOR FOR THE TREATMENT OF TIBIA OPEN FRACTURES,” IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 868–872, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/292498/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops