مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

343
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

229
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMER DISEASE REGISTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Context: Population aging is one of the most important health concerns worldwide, leading to an increase in the prevalence ofchronic diseases such as DEMENTIA and ALZHEIMER DISEASE (AD). Disease REGISTRIES have great potential to determine the effect ofclinical care, healthcare costs, and healthcare improvement for patients. Although there are several REGISTRIES for DEMENTIA andAD worldwide, no systematic review is so far performed in this area. Therefore, the current study aimed at identifying the basicinformation in DEMENTIA and AD REGISTRIES and comparing their characteristics. Evidence Acquisition: The current systematic review studied the DEMENTIA and AD REGISTRIES in English literature based on keywordsin the title with no time limitations, using the following DATABASEs: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), ProQuest, PubMed, Science Direct, Web of Science, Scopus, Ovid Medline, Scientific Information DATABASE (SID), and IranMedex (earliestentry to 07 February, 2017). In the current research, only the studies related to disease REGISTRIES were evaluated. Results: A total of 28 articles meeting the inclusion criteria were evaluated in the current study. Based on the findings, 22 DEMENTIAand AD REGISTRIES were identified. The majority of the REGISTRIES (13 REGISTRIES) were from North America. In half of the REGISTRIES, patient recruitment was performed among outpatients and inpatients referred to healthcare centers. The comparison of the structuralinformation in these registry systems showed that they differed in terms of objectives, data sources, minimum data sets, anddata quality. Conclusions: The current study was the 1st systematic review of DEMENTIA and AD REGISTRIES. Since there are no international standardsto develop DEMENTIA and AD REGISTRIES, comprehensive analysis can be effective to promote disease registry systems.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    SARSARSHAHI, AIDA, AHMADI, MARYAM, & NIAZKHANI, ZAHRA. (2017). A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMER DISEASE REGISTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), 19(11), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/293814/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SARSARSHAHI AIDA, AHMADI MARYAM, NIAZKHANI ZAHRA. A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMER DISEASE REGISTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ)[Internet]. 2017;19(11):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/293814/en

    IEEE: Copy

    AIDA SARSARSHAHI, MARYAM AHMADI, and ZAHRA NIAZKHANI, “A GLOBAL COMPARISON OF DEMENTIA AND ALZHEIMER DISEASE REGISTRIES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW,” IRANIAN RED CRESCENT MEDICAL JOURNAL (IRCMJ), vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/293814/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button