A COMPARATIVE IN VIVO STUDY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO FOUR SUTURING MATERIALS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KAKOUEI SHAHLA; BAGHAEE FAHIMEH; DABIRI SH.; PARIROKH M.; KAKOUEI SINA

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Endodontic Journal Year:2010 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 Page(s): 69-73

Download Full-Text

View:

389

Download:

182

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE IN VIVO STUDY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO FOUR SUTURING MATERIALS

Author(s)

Keywords

CATGUT

HISTOPATHOLOGIC

ORAL

POLYGLYCOLIC ACID

PVDF

SILK

SUTURES

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the HISTOPATHOLOGIC reaction of four suturing materials: SILK, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), POLYGLYCOLIC ACID, and CATGUT in the ORAL mucosa of albino rabbits.Materials and Methods: The twenty-one male mature albino rabbits which were used in this study were randomly divided into three groups of seven each. SILK, PVDF, POLYGLYCOLIC ACID and CATGUT suture materials were tested in the ORAL mucosa of these animals. The animals were sacrificed 2, 4, and 7 days after suturing. Two pathologists evaluated the samples by determining the presence and level of inflammation, granulation tissue, and fibrosis formation. Data were statistically analyzed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.Results: Histological features of the samples showed that PVDF and plain CATGUT suture materials produced more fibrous tissue (favorable response) on the fourth day in comparison with SILK suture (P=0.02). Also, in the 7-day samples PVDF SUTURES produced the mildest inflammation when compared with the SILK SUTURES (P=0.015).Conclusion: According to the results of this study, it can be convey that PVDF suture materials created mild tissue reactions and can be a reasonable candidate for suturing ORAL tissues.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

KAKOUEI, SHAHLA, BAGHAEE, FAHIMEH, DABIRI, SH., PARIROKH, M., & KAKOUEI, SINA. (2010). A COMPARATIVE IN VIVO STUDY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO FOUR SUTURING MATERIALS. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), 5(2), 69-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/302683/en

Vancouver: Copy

KAKOUEI SHAHLA, BAGHAEE FAHIMEH, DABIRI SH., PARIROKH M., KAKOUEI SINA. A COMPARATIVE IN VIVO STUDY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO FOUR SUTURING MATERIALS. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ)[Internet]. 2010;5(2):69-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/302683/en

IEEE: Copy

SHAHLA KAKOUEI, FAHIMEH BAGHAEE, SH. DABIRI, M. PARIROKH, and SINA KAKOUEI, “A COMPARATIVE IN VIVO STUDY OF TISSUE REACTIONS TO FOUR SUTURING MATERIALS,” IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 69–73, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/302683/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops