مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

316
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

68
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CT-NUMBER AND GRAY SCALE VALUE OF DIFFERENT DENTAL MATERIALS AND HARD TISSUES IN CT AND CBCT

Pages

  283-286

Abstract

 Introduction: COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY (CT) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) are valuable diagnostic aids for many clinical applications. This study was designed to compare the GRAY SCALE VALUE (GSV) and HOUNSFIELD UNIT (HU) of selected DENTAL MATERIALS and various hard tissues using CT or CBCT. Methods and Materials: Three samples of all test materials including amalgam (AM), composite resin (CR), glass ionomer (GI), zinc-oxide eugenol (ZOE), calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement, AH-26 root canal sealer (AH-26), gutta-percha (GP), Coltosol (Col), Dycal (DL), mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), zinc phosphate (ZP), and polycarbonate cement (PC) were prepared and scanned together with samples of bone, dentin and enamel using two CBCT devices, Scanora 3D (S3D) and NewTom VGi (NTV) and a spiral CT (SCT) scanner (Somatom Emotion 16 multislice spiral CT); Subsequently, the HU and GSV values were determined and evaluated. The data were analyzed by the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. The level of significance was determined at 0.05. Results: There were significant differences among the three different scanners (P<0.05). The differences between HU/GSV values of 12 selected DENTAL MATERIALS using NTV was significant (P<0.05) and for S3D and SCT was insignificant (P>0.05). All tested materials showed maximum values in S3D and SCT (3094 and 3071, respectively); however, bone and dentin showed low/medium values (P<0.05). In contrast, the tested materials and tissues showed a range of values in NTV (366 to15383; P<0.05). Conclusion: Scanner system can influence the obtained HU/GSV of DENTAL MATERIALS. NTV can discriminate various DENTAL MATERIALS, in contrast to S3D/SCT scanners. NTV may be a more useful diagnostic aid for clinical practice.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    EMADI, NAGHMEH, SAFI, YASER, AKBARZADEH BAGHEBAN, ALIREZA, & ASGARY, SAEED. (2014). COMPARISON OF CT-NUMBER AND GRAY SCALE VALUE OF DIFFERENT DENTAL MATERIALS AND HARD TISSUES IN CT AND CBCT. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), 9(4), 283-286. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/302821/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    EMADI NAGHMEH, SAFI YASER, AKBARZADEH BAGHEBAN ALIREZA, ASGARY SAEED. COMPARISON OF CT-NUMBER AND GRAY SCALE VALUE OF DIFFERENT DENTAL MATERIALS AND HARD TISSUES IN CT AND CBCT. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ)[Internet]. 2014;9(4):283-286. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/302821/en

    IEEE: Copy

    NAGHMEH EMADI, YASER SAFI, ALIREZA AKBARZADEH BAGHEBAN, and SAEED ASGARY, “COMPARISON OF CT-NUMBER AND GRAY SCALE VALUE OF DIFFERENT DENTAL MATERIALS AND HARD TISSUES IN CT AND CBCT,” IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 283–286, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/302821/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button