Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ANSARI GHASSEM; MOROVATI SEYYEDEH POUYA; ASGARY SAEED

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Endodontic Journal Year:2018 | Volume:13 | Issue:1 Page(s): 7-12

Download Full-Text

View:

156

Download:

123

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Author(s)

ANSARI GHASSEM | MOROVATI SEYYEDEH POUYA | ASGARY SAEED | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Calcium-Enriched Mixture

CEM Cement

Ferric Sulfate

Formocresol

Low Level Laser Therapy

Primary Molar

Pulpotomy

Abstract

Introduction: This trial was designed to evaluate the clinical and radiographic success rates of Calcium-Enriched Mixture (CEM) cement with and without Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) and compare them to that of Formocresol (FC) and Ferric Sulfate (FS) in Primary Molar pulpotomies. Methods and Materials: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on a total of 160 teeth selected from 40 patients aged 3-9 years. Patients with at least four Primary Molars needing Pulpotomy, were included in order to have each tooth assigned randomly in one of the four following groups; FC, FS, CEM, and LLLT/CEM. Six-and twelve-month follow-up periods were conducted in order to enable a clinical and radiographic evaluation of the treated teeth. Collected data were analyzed using Cochran Q Tests. Results: The 12-month clinical success rate for each technique was: FC=100%, FS=95%, CEM=97. 5% and LLLT/CEM=100% with no significant differences (P>0. 05). Furthermore, 12-month radiographic success rate for each technique was: FC=100%, FS=92. 5%, CEM=95% and LLLT/CEM=100% with no significant differences (P>0. 05). Conclusion: Favorable outcomes of four treatment techniques in Pulpotomy of Primary Molar teeth were comparable. CEM with/without LLLT may be considered as a safe and successful Pulpotomy treatment modality compared to current conventional methods.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ANSARI, GHASSEM, MOROVATI, SEYYEDEH POUYA, & ASGARY, SAEED. (2018). Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), 13(1), 7-12. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/303030/en

Vancouver: Copy

ANSARI GHASSEM, MOROVATI SEYYEDEH POUYA, ASGARY SAEED. Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial. IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ)[Internet]. 2018;13(1):7-12. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/303030/en

IEEE: Copy

GHASSEM ANSARI, SEYYEDEH POUYA MOROVATI, and SAEED ASGARY, “Evaluation of Four Pulpotomy Techniques in Primary Molars: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” IRANIAN ENDODONTIC JOURNAL (IEJ), vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 7–12, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/303030/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops