مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

356
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

237
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY OF LIVER IN A SWINE MODEL

Author(s)

HAMIDIAN JAHROMI ALIREZA | BALLARD DAVID HILTON | BAHRAMI REZA | VICENTE DAGOSTINO HORACIO RUBEN | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  0-0

Abstract

 Background: The quality of LIVER biopsy specimens obtained with different FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY (FNB) techniques has not been compared.Objectives: This study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic quality of three different LIVER FNB biopsy techniques.Materials and Methods: Two sequential biopsy series were performed on piglets. Three biopsy techniques were compared: capillary-FNB, core-FNB (CFNB) and vacuum-assisted CFNB (VACFNB) in a swine model. Initially, 30 LIVER biopsies were performed (ten for each technique). The cellularity and quantity of blood in specimens were measured and compared. In the second series, 54 additional biopsies using CFNB and VACFNB techniques (27 each) in a separate piglet were evaluated in the same fashion.Results: In the first series, cellularity and blood levels were significantly lower in capillary-FNB compared with CFNB (P < 0.001 and P = 0.011, respectively). There was no significant difference between CFNB and VACFNB in cellularity and blood (P = 0.15 and P = 0.1, respectively). In the second series, cellularity was significantly higher in CFNB compared with VACFNB (P < 0.001) with no significant difference in blood (P = 0.5).Conclusions: Among these three different FNB techniques, CFNB technique provided the greatest cellularity. Capillary-FNB technique was inferior among all with the lowest quality of obtained material for cytopathological interpretation.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HAMIDIAN JAHROMI, ALIREZA, BALLARD, DAVID HILTON, BAHRAMI, REZA, & VICENTE DAGOSTINO, HORACIO RUBEN. (2015). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY OF LIVER IN A SWINE MODEL. HEPATITIS MONTHLY, 15(6), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/306944/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HAMIDIAN JAHROMI ALIREZA, BALLARD DAVID HILTON, BAHRAMI REZA, VICENTE DAGOSTINO HORACIO RUBEN. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY OF LIVER IN A SWINE MODEL. HEPATITIS MONTHLY[Internet]. 2015;15(6):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/306944/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ALIREZA HAMIDIAN JAHROMI, DAVID HILTON BALLARD, REZA BAHRAMI, and HORACIO RUBEN VICENTE DAGOSTINO, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES OF ULTRASOUND-GUIDED FINE NEEDLE BIOPSY OF LIVER IN A SWINE MODEL,” HEPATITIS MONTHLY, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 0–0, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/306944/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button