SALIVA OR SERUM, WHICH IS BETTER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION?

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ESTAKHRI R.; DOULATKHAH H.; GHAZANCHAEI A.; POURASGHARI B.; NOURAZARIAN M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES Year:2008 | Volume:3 | Issue:3 Page(s): 121-125

Download Full-Text

View:

320

Download:

122

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SALIVA OR SERUM, WHICH IS BETTER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION?

Author(s)

Keywords

ANTI-H. PYLORI IGG

ELISA

SALIVA

Abstract

Background: Helicobacter pylori is known as an agent which may involve in the occurrence of peptic ulcer, gastric cancer and also other known and unknown diseases. Treatment of the infection with antibiotics eradicates the disease and prevents its pathologic effects. A noninvasive and inexpensive method for detection of the infection is needed. In this study the diagnostic values of serum and SALIVA anti H. pylori IgG was evaluated. Patients and methods: The SALIVA and blood samples were collected from 114 patients who underwent upper GI endoscopy and gastric biopsy. Tissue samples were examined by rapid urease test and microscopic study. SALIVA and serum samples were tested by ELISA-based test for anti H. pylori IgG, using a commercial kit. Results: From 114 cases, 61 (53.5%) patients were positive for H. pylori in rapid urease test and microscopic study and 53 (46.5%) were negative in both tests. Rates of positive result for H. pylori in patients with and without peptic ulcer were almost similar. Mean values of anti H. pylori IgG in SALIVA and serum of H. pylori positive patients were higher than H. pylori negative patients. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of tests in SALIVA were 83.6%, 71.7%, 77.3%, 79.1%, 78.1% and in serum were 90.2%, 86.8%, 88.7%, 88.4% and 88.6% respectively.Conclusion: It was concluded that ELISA-based anti H. pylori IgG test in SALIVA could be used as an alternative diagnostic test in the absence of other invasive procedures.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

ESTAKHRI, R., DOULATKHAH, H., GHAZANCHAEI, A., POURASGHARI, B., & NOURAZARIAN, M.. (2008). SALIVA OR SERUM, WHICH IS BETTER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION?. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 3(3), 121-125. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/313492/en

Vancouver: Copy

ESTAKHRI R., DOULATKHAH H., GHAZANCHAEI A., POURASGHARI B., NOURAZARIAN M.. SALIVA OR SERUM, WHICH IS BETTER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION?. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES[Internet]. 2008;3(3):121-125. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/313492/en

IEEE: Copy

R. ESTAKHRI, H. DOULATKHAH, A. GHAZANCHAEI, B. POURASGHARI, and M. NOURAZARIAN, “SALIVA OR SERUM, WHICH IS BETTER FOR THE DIAGNOSIS OF GASTRIC HELICOBACTER PYLORI INFECTION?,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 121–125, 2008, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/313492/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops