مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

356
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

150
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVIDENCE MARKING IN RESEARCH ARTICLES: AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS SOURCES AND RELATIVE RELIABILITY THROUGH QUALITY MARKERS

Author(s)

 ABDI R. | Issue Writer Certificate 

Pages

  1-26

Abstract

 Evidence occupies a paramount position in any logical endeavor and research article is consensually considered a predominant site of such an endeavor. One interesting area of rhetoric which addresses the source and reliability of EVIDENCE is QUALITY METADISCOURSE. In this qualitative study, QUALITY METADISCOURSE strategies (i.e., EVIDENTIALS, HEDGES, BOOSTERS and DISCLAIMERS) are examined to investigate their contribution to EVIDENTIALITY in research articles. Through analyzing authentic examples taken from research articles, it is concluded that EVIDENTIALS mark the source of EVIDENCE and the other strategies are employed to condition propositions proportionate to the strength of relevant EVIDENCE. In fact, this study helps to argue that reliability markers demonstrate the author-perceived distance of propositions from the impact range of EVIDENCE. Contrary to the broad definition of metadiscourse, the paper concludes that without appropriate types of markers, propositions could lose their quality, and as such, they are an indispensable part of the propositions they modify in the broader pragmatic context. Thus, in addition to a contribution to the definition of metadiscourse, this conceptualization is hoped to facilitate teaching and learning QUALITY METADISCOURSE in that it defines a more plausible base to the appropriate employment of quality-related metadiscourse strategies.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABDI, R.. (2012). EVIDENCE MARKING IN RESEARCH ARTICLES: AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS SOURCES AND RELATIVE RELIABILITY THROUGH QUALITY MARKERS. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), 3(4 (65/4)), 1-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/318010/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABDI R.. EVIDENCE MARKING IN RESEARCH ARTICLES: AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS SOURCES AND RELATIVE RELIABILITY THROUGH QUALITY MARKERS. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS)[Internet]. 2012;3(4 (65/4)):1-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/318010/en

    IEEE: Copy

    R. ABDI, “EVIDENCE MARKING IN RESEARCH ARTICLES: AN INVESTIGATION OF ITS SOURCES AND RELATIVE RELIABILITY THROUGH QUALITY MARKERS,” TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), vol. 3, no. 4 (65/4), pp. 1–26, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/318010/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button