PEER REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS ON RESEARCH ARTICLES SUBMITTED BY IRANIAN RESEARCHERS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

THARIRIAN M.H.; SADRI E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES OF SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY Year:2013 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 (72/4) Page(s): 107-123

Download Full-Text

View:

275

Download:

207

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

PEER REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS ON RESEARCH ARTICLES SUBMITTED BY IRANIAN RESEARCHERS

Author(s)

THARIRIAN M.H. | SADRI E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PEER REVIEW PROCESS

REVIEWERS’ REPORTS

COMMENT

CONTENT COMMENT

LANGUAGE-USE COMMENT

Abstract

Peer review plays a determining role in the eventual fate of submissions to international English-medium journals. In this study, a corpus of reviewers’ reports on 32 manuscripts in 3 different fields was solicited from a number of Iranian graduate students and a content analysis was performed to find the common organizational patterns and also the most frequent types of problems noted by the reviewers. The results revealed that review reports followed a certain format in terms of structural organization and negative/positive balance of the comments. Also, the results demonstrated that the most frequent type of problems noted by reviewers were contentrelated defects. However, because scientific information is conveyed through the language and content failure often overlaps language issues, language-use comments should be considered as important.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

THARIRIAN, M.H., & SADRI, E.. (2013). PEER REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS ON RESEARCH ARTICLES SUBMITTED BY IRANIAN RESEARCHERS. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), 5(3 (72/4)), 107-123. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/318080/en

Vancouver: Copy

THARIRIAN M.H., SADRI E.. PEER REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS ON RESEARCH ARTICLES SUBMITTED BY IRANIAN RESEARCHERS. TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS)[Internet]. 2013;5(3 (72/4)):107-123. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/318080/en

IEEE: Copy

M.H. THARIRIAN, and E. SADRI, “PEER REVIEWERS’ COMMENTS ON RESEARCH ARTICLES SUBMITTED BY IRANIAN RESEARCHERS,” TEACHING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE QUARTERL (JOURNAL OF TEACHING LANGUAGE SKILLS), vol. 5, no. 3 (72/4), pp. 107–123, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/318080/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops