مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

263
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

135
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND BOLUS ENTERAL FEEDING METHODS ON ENTERAL FEEDING INTOLERANCE OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A TRIPLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS

Pages

  218-227

Abstract

 Recent trials have shown controversial results on which enteral FEEDING METHODS has a lower risk of ENTERAL FEEDING intolerance. Therefore, we aimed to compare two methods of bolus and intermittent feeding on ENTERAL FEEDING intolerance of patients with SEPSIS.METHODS This triple-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on 60 patients with SEPSIS, who were fed through tubes for at least 3 days. The patients were randomly assigned into bolus feeding, intermittent feeding, and control groups. ENTERAL FEEDING intolerance of all patients was recorded in 3 consecutive days by a researcher-made checklist including the data on gastric residual volume, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal distension.RESULTS There were no significant differences between the three studied groups in none of the interventiondays pertaining to constipation, diarrhea, vomiting, abdominal distention, and gastric residual volume (p>0.05). Also, no statistically significant difference was found between all variables in the three studied groups during the 3 days (p>0.05).CONCLUSION As ENTERAL FEEDING intolerance of patients with SEPSIS was similar in both bolus and intermittent FEEDING METHODS, it can be concluded that bolus method can still be used as a standard method to decrease the risk of ENTERAL FEEDING intolerance if it is used properly.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    NASIRI, MORTEZA, FARSI, ZAHRA, AHANGARI, MOJTABA, & DADGARI, FAHIMEH. (2017). COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND BOLUS ENTERAL FEEDING METHODS ON ENTERAL FEEDING INTOLERANCE OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A TRIPLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS. MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES (MEJDD), 9(4), 218-227. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/319150/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NASIRI MORTEZA, FARSI ZAHRA, AHANGARI MOJTABA, DADGARI FAHIMEH. COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND BOLUS ENTERAL FEEDING METHODS ON ENTERAL FEEDING INTOLERANCE OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A TRIPLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS. MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES (MEJDD)[Internet]. 2017;9(4):218-227. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/319150/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MORTEZA NASIRI, ZAHRA FARSI, MOJTABA AHANGARI, and FAHIMEH DADGARI, “COMPARISON OF INTERMITTENT AND BOLUS ENTERAL FEEDING METHODS ON ENTERAL FEEDING INTOLERANCE OF PATIENTS WITH SEPSIS: A TRIPLE-BLIND CONTROLLED TRIAL IN INTENSIVE CARE UNITS,” MIDDLE EAST JOURNAL OF DIGESTIVE DISEASES (MEJDD), vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 218–227, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/319150/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button