مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

221
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

118
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures

Pages

  309-313

Abstract

 Background: Fracture/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Distal radius Fractures constitute 17% of all Fractures and 75% of forearm Fractures in adults. Due to the vital role of the hands in a wide range of daily tasks, quick recovery and fewer complications for the patients are important. The purpose of this study was to compare the two common treatments of Fracture/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Distal radius Fractures namely, Percutaneous pinning and Pin-in-plaster. Methods: An observational analytical cohort study was conducted on 74 patients with Fracture/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Distal radius Fracture treated with Percutaneous pinning fixation and Pin-in-plaster techniques. The patients, aged more than or equal to 18 years with unilateral, closed and unstable Fracture/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank">Distal radius Fractures were treated in Shahid Beheshti Hospital during 2007 to 2010. The data were entered into the SPSS Version 20 statistical software and analyzed by student’ s t-test, one-way ANOVA and repeated measures test. Results: Randomly, 31 patients were in Pin-in-plaster group and 43 patients in Percutaneous pinning group. The patients’ age range was 18-74 years. The average of radial inclination and palmar tilt after 6 weeks was significant (P=0. 02, p<0. 0001) in patients with Percutaneous pinning. The performance of the patients after 3 and 12 months in both groups was significant (p=<0. 0001). Conclusion: This study revealed that in approach to unstable DRF in adults, PCP method shows better improvement compared to PP technique.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Tajeddin, Farhang, BAGHIANI MOGHADAM, BEHNAM, KAMALI AHANGAR, SEKINEH, & Bahrami Feridoni, Masood. (2019). Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 10(3), 309-313. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/323621/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Tajeddin Farhang, BAGHIANI MOGHADAM BEHNAM, KAMALI AHANGAR SEKINEH, Bahrami Feridoni Masood. Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures. CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2019;10(3):309-313. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/323621/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Farhang Tajeddin, BEHNAM BAGHIANI MOGHADAM, SEKINEH KAMALI AHANGAR, and Masood Bahrami Feridoni, “Percutaneous pinning versus pin-in-plaster for treatment of distal radius fractures,” CASPIAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 309–313, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/323621/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button