Comparing Time-Use Estimates of TwoDifferent Time Diary Methods

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOURTIJI HOSSEIN; RASSAFIANI MEHDI; HOSSEINI SEYED ALI; MOTLAGH MOHAMMAD ESMAEIL; NOROOZI MEHDI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Rehabilitation Journal Year:2018 | Volume:16 | Issue:4 Page(s): 387-394

Download Full-Text

View:

250

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparing Time-Use Estimates of TwoDifferent Time Diary Methods

Author(s)

Keywords

Time-use

Yesterday-diary

Tomorrow-diary

Children

Abstract

Objectives: Time-use has become an important field of research in social and medical sciences. Time diary is the most popular method for measuring Time-use that has 2 different methods ofadministration including yesterday and tomorrow diary. The present study aimed to comparethese methods of measuring Time-use. Methods: This cross-sectional comparative study was conducted on 256 under 5-year-oldhealthy Children that were selected using multistage stratified cluster sampling method in 2017. Data were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test, Pearson correlation coefficient, Spearmancorrelation coefficient, 2-way ANOVA, Independent t-test and Mann– Whitney U Test. Results: Participants spent 1476. 23 min/d on aggregate daily occupations, according to theyesterday-diary estimate, and 1492. 14 min/d according to the Tomorrow-diary. In one area ofoccupation, the yesterday and tomorrow diary estimates differed slightly. Two-way ANOVAfound no significant interaction between diary method and age category (F5, 234=1. 222, P=0. 300)and no significant main effect of diary method (F1, 234 =0. 830). While, the ANOVA revealed asignificant main effect for age category (F5, 234=4. 91, P=0. 00). There were no significant meandifferences in the number of occupational repertoires between the participants of yesterdayand tomorrow diary groups. Likewise, there were no significant differences in the number ofverbatim of the two groups. Discussion: The findings of our study indicated no difference between yesterday and tomorrowdiaries estimates in terms of measuring under 5-year-old Children’ s Time-use.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

SOURTIJI, HOSSEIN, RASSAFIANI, MEHDI, HOSSEINI, SEYED ALI, MOTLAGH, MOHAMMAD ESMAEIL, & NOROOZI, MEHDI. (2018). Comparing Time-Use Estimates of TwoDifferent Time Diary Methods. IRANIAN REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 16(4), 387-394. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/325559/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOURTIJI HOSSEIN, RASSAFIANI MEHDI, HOSSEINI SEYED ALI, MOTLAGH MOHAMMAD ESMAEIL, NOROOZI MEHDI. Comparing Time-Use Estimates of TwoDifferent Time Diary Methods. IRANIAN REHABILITATION JOURNAL[Internet]. 2018;16(4):387-394. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/325559/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN SOURTIJI, MEHDI RASSAFIANI, SEYED ALI HOSSEINI, MOHAMMAD ESMAEIL MOTLAGH, and MEHDI NOROOZI, “Comparing Time-Use Estimates of TwoDifferent Time Diary Methods,” IRANIAN REHABILITATION JOURNAL, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/325559/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops