Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

355
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

188
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF ACCURACY OF DIAGNODENT IN DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CARIES IN COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL METHODS (REVIEW ARTICLE)

Pages

  159-167

Abstract

 Introduction: Today the prevalence of teeth decays has considerably decreased. Related organizations and institutions mention several reasons for it such as improvement of decay diagnostic equipment and tools which are even capable of detecting caries in their initial stages. This resulted in reduction of costs for patients and remarkable increase in teeth life span. There are many methods for decay diagnostic, like: visual and radiographic methods, devices with FLUORESCENCE such as Quantitative light-induced FLUORESCENCE (QLF), Vista proof, LASER FLUORESCENCE (LF or DIAGNOdent), FLUORESCENCE Camera (FC) and Digital radiography. Although DIAGNOdent is considered a valuable device for decay diagnostic, there are concerns regarding its efficacy and accuracy. Considering the sensitivity of decay diagnosis and the exorbitant annual expenses supported by government and people for caries treatment, finding the best method for early caries detection is of the most importance.Numerous studies were performed to compare different diagnostic methods with conflicting results. The objective of this study is a comparative review of the efficiency of DIAGNOdent in comparison to visual methods and radiographic methods in the diagnostic of teeth occlusal surfaces.Methods: Search of PubMed, Google Scholar electronic resources was performed in order to find clinical trials in English in the period between 1998 and 2013. Full texts of only 35 articles were available.Conclusion: Considering the sensitivity and specificity reported in the different studies, it seems that DIAGNOdent is an appropriate modality for caries detection as a complementary method beside other methods and its use alone to obtain treatment plan is not enough.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NOKHBATOLFOGHAHAIE, HANIEH, ALIKHASI, MARZIEH, CHINIFORUSH, NASIM, KHOEI, FARZANEH, SAFAVI, NASSIMEH, & YAGHOUB ZADEH, BEHNOUSH. (2013). EVALUATION OF ACCURACY OF DIAGNODENT IN DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CARIES IN COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL METHODS (REVIEW ARTICLE). JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 4(4), 159-167. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/325862/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NOKHBATOLFOGHAHAIE HANIEH, ALIKHASI MARZIEH, CHINIFORUSH NASIM, KHOEI FARZANEH, SAFAVI NASSIMEH, YAGHOUB ZADEH BEHNOUSH. EVALUATION OF ACCURACY OF DIAGNODENT IN DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CARIES IN COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL METHODS (REVIEW ARTICLE). JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2013;4(4):159-167. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/325862/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HANIEH NOKHBATOLFOGHAHAIE, MARZIEH ALIKHASI, NASIM CHINIFORUSH, FARZANEH KHOEI, NASSIMEH SAFAVI, and BEHNOUSH YAGHOUB ZADEH, “EVALUATION OF ACCURACY OF DIAGNODENT IN DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CARIES IN COMPARISON TO CONVENTIONAL METHODS (REVIEW ARTICLE),” JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 159–167, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/325862/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top