مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

196
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

109
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF INFRARED PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS CLOSED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOID

Pages

  23-26

Abstract

 Introduction: INFRARED PHOTOCOAGULATION (IRC) was introduced as a mainstay procedure for treatment of HEMORRHOIDs. The present study aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of IRC compared to closed HEMORRHOIDECTOMY/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HEMORRHOIDECTOMY.Methods: Forty patients suffering grade-3 HEMORRHOID that referred to the surgery clinic at Imam Hossein hospital in Tehran in 2013 were randomly assigned to groups treated with the IRC modality or Ferguson’s closed HEMORRHOIDECTOMY/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HEMORRHOIDECTOMY method. The patients in the 2 groups were followed-up for the first 24 hours after surgery and 8 weeks later. Postoperative PAIN was assessed using visual analogue scale (VAS) at three time points of 24 hours, 2 weeks and 8 weeks after operation.Results: Regarding BLEEDING, its overall prevalence was 5.0% in the IRC group and 30.0% in the HEMORRHOIDECTOMY/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HEMORRHOIDECTOMY group, which was significantly less prevalent in the IRC group. Notably, the IRC group had a lower mean postoperative PAIN score compared to the HEMORRHOIDECTOMY/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HEMORRHOIDECTOMY group. Time of return to work was significantly shorter in the IRC group; no difference was found in the mean duration of hospital stay, and recurrence rate across 2 groups.Conclusion: IRC procedure is safer than closed HEMORRHOIDECTOMY/fa?page=1&sort=1&ftyp=all&fgrp=all&fyrs=all" target="_blank"> HEMORRHOIDECTOMY with lower postoperative PAIN severity, less secondary BLEEDING, and leads to earlier return to work in patients with HEMORRHOID.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    NIKSHOAR, MOHAMMAD REZA, MALEKI, ZAHRA, & NEMATI HONAR, BEHZAD. (2018). THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF INFRARED PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS CLOSED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOID. JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, 9(1), 23-26. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/326009/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    NIKSHOAR MOHAMMAD REZA, MALEKI ZAHRA, NEMATI HONAR BEHZAD. THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF INFRARED PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS CLOSED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOID. JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2018;9(1):23-26. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/326009/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MOHAMMAD REZA NIKSHOAR, ZAHRA MALEKI, and BEHZAD NEMATI HONAR, “THE CLINICAL EFFICACY OF INFRARED PHOTOCOAGULATION VERSUS CLOSED HEMORRHOIDECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF HEMORRHOID,” JOURNAL OF LASERS IN MEDICAL SCIENCES, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 23–26, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/326009/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button