مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

853
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CLOSURE AND NONCLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM AT PREVIOUS ‎CESAREAN DELIVERY AND INCIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT ADHESIONS AT REPEAT CESAREAN ‎SECTION

Pages

  175-179

Abstract

 Objective: Abdominal operations is associated with celiac ADHESIONs; this study compares the frequency and severity of ADHESIONs following cesarean sections performed with and without CLOSURE of the parietal and visceral peritoneum.Materials and Methods: A prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat cesarean delivery was designed. All surgeons were asked immediately after surgery to score the severity and location of ADHESIONs. Patient records were then abstracted to assess prior surgical technique, including parietal peritoneal CLOSURE, other attributes of first surgery, and patient characteristics. The chi square test and multivariable logistic regression were used for statistical comparison and analysis. Results: One hundred fifty patients were enrolled. (70 patients with Prior parietal peritoneal nonclosure and 80 patients with Prior parietal peritoneal CLOSURE): CLOSURE of the PARIETAL PERITONEUM at the time of the first cesarean section was associated with significantly less visceral ADHESIONs than CLOSURE (45% versus 77%, P=0.006) and significantly fewer dense ADHESIONs (33% versus 48%, P=0.03). Conclusion: Parietal peritoneal CLOSURE at primary cesarean delivery was associated with significantly fewer and filmy ADHESIONs. The practice of nonclosure of the PARIETAL PERITONEUM at cesarean delivery should be questioned.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    SEKHAVAT, L., TABATABAEI BAFGHI, A., & KARIMZADEH MEYBODI, M.A.. (2007). COMPARISON OF CLOSURE AND NONCLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM AT PREVIOUS ‎CESAREAN DELIVERY AND INCIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT ADHESIONS AT REPEAT CESAREAN ‎SECTION. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, 12(2), 175-179. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/32822/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SEKHAVAT L., TABATABAEI BAFGHI A., KARIMZADEH MEYBODI M.A.. COMPARISON OF CLOSURE AND NONCLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM AT PREVIOUS ‎CESAREAN DELIVERY AND INCIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT ADHESIONS AT REPEAT CESAREAN ‎SECTION. KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2007;12(2):175-179. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/32822/en

    IEEE: Copy

    L. SEKHAVAT, A. TABATABAEI BAFGHI, and M.A. KARIMZADEH MEYBODI, “COMPARISON OF CLOSURE AND NONCLOSURE OF THE PERITONEUM AT PREVIOUS ‎CESAREAN DELIVERY AND INCIDENCE OF SIGNIFICANT ADHESIONS AT REPEAT CESAREAN ‎SECTION,” KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 175–179, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/32822/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top