EVALUATION OF CLINICAL RESULTS OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION (BPB AND Z & R TECHNIQUES)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

JANNESARI M.; KARIMI R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL Year:2005 | Volume:10 | Issue:Part 1 Page(s): 73-78

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,451

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL RESULTS OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION (BPB AND Z & R TECHNIQUES)

Author(s)

JANNESARI M. | KARIMI R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

ACLQ4

LYSHOLM KNEE SCOREQ4

BONE PATELLAR BONEQ4

ZARINS & ROWEQ4

Abstract

Objective: The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is the most important intra articular stabilizer of the knee. In 1980 the orthopedic sport medicine community focused on injury of the ACL as a major cause of athletic disability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of the ACL reconstruction by two different current techniques. Material and Methods: a prospective randomized clinical trial study was performed on 50 patients with ACL rupture during a two year period (2002 - 2003). 25 of these were operated with Zarins & Rowe (Z&R) technique. The other 25 cases were operated with Bone Patellar the Bone (BPB) technique. The mean time for follow up was 16 months. Results: All patients were men, with an average age of 27 years (range 20-40), 32 cases (68%) were left and 18 (36%) right knee. The original cause of damage was military training in 23 (46%) knee, sport injury in 15 (30%) and traffic accidents in 12 (24%) cases. Meniscal and cartilage injuries were detected in 31 (52%) and 9 (18%) of the knees respectively. All patients were returned to pre-injury activity 6 months after operation. 96% patients of the Z & Rand 32% of the BPB groups had anterior knee score of 95 points compared with 68% BPB and LYSHOLM KNEE SCORE 88 points. The remainder in the both groups was rated as good. The results were similar in both groups (P>0.05). In the assessment of relation between associated injuries and chronicity of ACL injury with decreasing of LYSHOLM KNEE SCOREs and patients dissatisfaction, we found a positive correlation (P=0.00).But there was no relationship between meniscal injury and patient disfunction (P>0.05). Conclusion: According to our overall results both reconstruction techniques are comparable but improvement of patient satisfaction was noted with ACL reconstruction in the early stages of the ACL rupture.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

JANNESARI, M., & KARIMI, R.. (2005). EVALUATION OF CLINICAL RESULTS OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION (BPB AND Z & R TECHNIQUES). KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, 10(Part 1), 73-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/32831/en

Vancouver: Copy

JANNESARI M., KARIMI R.. EVALUATION OF CLINICAL RESULTS OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION (BPB AND Z & R TECHNIQUES). KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2005;10(Part 1):73-78. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/32831/en

IEEE: Copy

M. JANNESARI, and R. KARIMI, “EVALUATION OF CLINICAL RESULTS OF ACL RECONSTRUCTION (BPB AND Z & R TECHNIQUES),” KOWSAR MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 10, no. Part 1, pp. 73–78, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/32831/en

Related Journal Papers