مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

403
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

132
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FILM AND DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION

Pages

  1-5

Abstract

 Introduction: Various systems for intraoral DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY have been available as an alternative to FILM–based RADIOGRAPHY. In consideration of several advantages of DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY such as less patient absorbed dose, manipulation of image quality and elimination of processing, it has been extensively used in different fields of dentistry in recent years. The purpose of this study was comparison of conventional FILM and DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY in the proximal caries diagnosis.Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, 60 extracted premolar teeth were selected and mounted in acrylic blocks. The teeth were radiographed using F-speed FILM and a complementary metal oxide semiconductor DIGITAL sensor (CMOS). Two observers evaluated interproximal surfaces for detection of presence and extent of caries. True caries depth was determined by histological examination. The diagnostic accuracy of each radiographic system were assessed by means of receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.Results: There was no significant difference between two imaging modalities. The AZ values in cases without caries and dentinal caries were greater than caries restricted to enamel and Dentino Enamel Junction (DEJ). The differences among observers also were not statistically significant.Conclusion: Both imaging modalities were comparable in the detection of proximal carious lesions.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOHTAVIPOOR, SEIDEHTAHEREH, SHAHSAVARI, FATEMEH, JAVADZADEH HAGHIGHAT, ALIEH SADAT, MOHTAVIPOUR, SEIEDEH SAEIDEH, & MALEKSHOAR, MILAD. (2013). IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FILM AND DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION. JOURNAL OF DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY AND SURGERY, 1(2), 1-5. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/331561/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOHTAVIPOOR SEIDEHTAHEREH, SHAHSAVARI FATEMEH, JAVADZADEH HAGHIGHAT ALIEH SADAT, MOHTAVIPOUR SEIEDEH SAEIDEH, MALEKSHOAR MILAD. IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FILM AND DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION. JOURNAL OF DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY AND SURGERY[Internet]. 2013;1(2):1-5. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/331561/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEIDEHTAHEREH MOHTAVIPOOR, FATEMEH SHAHSAVARI, ALIEH SADAT JAVADZADEH HAGHIGHAT, SEIEDEH SAEIDEH MOHTAVIPOUR, and MILAD MALEKSHOAR, “IN VITRO COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL FILM AND DIRECT DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY IN PROXIMAL CARIES DETECTION,” JOURNAL OF DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, PATHOLOGY AND SURGERY, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–5, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/331561/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button