مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

310
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

160
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN A TWO PERSON INSERTION TECHNIQUE OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND THE CLASSIC ONE PERSON TECHNIQUE (SHORT COMMUNICATION)

Pages

  179-182

Abstract

 Background: Various studies are seeking to find new methods to improve TECHNIQUEs of LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY (LMA) insertion and reduce possible complications. In this study, we embarked on a clinical study to investigate the advantages of a new insertion method of laryngeal mask and to compare it with the classic method. Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients aged 20-60 years old were randomly divided into two groups allocated to receive either the new TECHNIQUE of insertion of LMA (two-person method) or the classic method (one-person method). In the two person method, jaw thrust and mouth opening is done by a technician and then anesthesiologist inserts the LMA. OXYGEN SATURATION, time to insert laryngeal mask, end-tidal CARBON DIOXIDE pressure, and the ease of insertion in both groups were measured. The collected data were analyzed by using ANOVA test. P-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: The measured end-tidal pressure of CARBON DIOXIDE (ETCO2) and saturation of O2 were 31.68 mmHg and 98.87 % in the classic method and 30.47 mmHg and 99.42 % in the two-person method, respectively. These differences were statistically significant for both values. However, the discrepancy of insertion time and ease of insertion between the two groups were not statistically considerable.Conclusion: The new TECHNIQUE introduced in this study is associated with higher rate of success, as evidenced by enhancement of saturation of O2 and reduction of ETCO2. Therefore, this method could be considered as a safe and effective method in order to establish a secure airway in anesthetized patients in future studies.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    PARVIZ KAZEMI, ASEF, DANESHFOROOZ, MOHAMMAD ALI, & OMIDVARI, SHAHRIAR. (2013). A COMPARISON BETWEEN A TWO PERSON INSERTION TECHNIQUE OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND THE CLASSIC ONE PERSON TECHNIQUE (SHORT COMMUNICATION). GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2(4), 179-182. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/332561/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    PARVIZ KAZEMI ASEF, DANESHFOROOZ MOHAMMAD ALI, OMIDVARI SHAHRIAR. A COMPARISON BETWEEN A TWO PERSON INSERTION TECHNIQUE OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND THE CLASSIC ONE PERSON TECHNIQUE (SHORT COMMUNICATION). GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL[Internet]. 2013;2(4):179-182. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/332561/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ASEF PARVIZ KAZEMI, MOHAMMAD ALI DANESHFOROOZ, and SHAHRIAR OMIDVARI, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN A TWO PERSON INSERTION TECHNIQUE OF LARYNGEAL MASK AIRWAY AND THE CLASSIC ONE PERSON TECHNIQUE (SHORT COMMUNICATION),” GALEN MEDICAL JOURNAL, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 179–182, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/332561/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button