HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL TO QUANTIFY PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES THROUGH CITIZENS’ JURIES; PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

WHITTY JENNIFER A.; BURTON PAUL; KENDALL ELIZABETH; RATCLIFFE JULIE; WILSON ANDREW; LITTLEJOHNS PETER; SCUFFHAM PAUL A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2014 | Volume:3 | Issue:2 Page(s): 57-62

Download Full-Text

View:

228

Download:

340

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL TO QUANTIFY PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES THROUGH CITIZENS’ JURIES; PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE

Author(s)

Keywords

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION

HEALTH POLICY

DECISION-MAKING

PUBLIC PREFERENCES

CITIZENS’ JURY (CJ)

DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT (DCE)

Abstract

Despite progress towards greater public engagement, questions about the optimal approach to access PUBLIC PREFERENCES remain unanswered. We review two increasingly popular methods for engaging the public in healthcare priority-setting and determining their preferences; the Citizens’ Jury (CJ) and Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE). We discuss the theoretical framework from which each method is derived, its application in healthcare, and critique the information it can provide for decision-makers. We conclude that combining deliberation of an informed public via CJs and quantification of preferences using DCE methods, whilst it remains to be tested as an approach to engaging the public in priority-setting, could potentially achieve much richer information than the application of either method in isolation.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

WHITTY, JENNIFER A., BURTON, PAUL, KENDALL, ELIZABETH, RATCLIFFE, JULIE, WILSON, ANDREW, LITTLEJOHNS, PETER, & SCUFFHAM, PAUL A.. (2014). HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL TO QUANTIFY PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES THROUGH CITIZENS’ JURIES; PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 3(2), 57-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/337994/en

Vancouver: Copy

WHITTY JENNIFER A., BURTON PAUL, KENDALL ELIZABETH, RATCLIFFE JULIE, WILSON ANDREW, LITTLEJOHNS PETER, SCUFFHAM PAUL A.. HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL TO QUANTIFY PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES THROUGH CITIZENS’ JURIES; PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2014;3(2):57-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/337994/en

IEEE: Copy

JENNIFER A. WHITTY, PAUL BURTON, ELIZABETH KENDALL, JULIE RATCLIFFE, ANDREW WILSON, PETER LITTLEJOHNS, and PAUL A. SCUFFHAM, “HARNESSING THE POTENTIAL TO QUANTIFY PUBLIC PREFERENCES FOR HEALTHCARE PRIORITIES THROUGH CITIZENS’ JURIES; PERSPECTIVE; PERSPECTIVE,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/337994/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops