VALIDATING AND DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF ITEMS USED FOR EVALUATING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HOOSHMAND ELAHEH; TOURANI SOGAND; RAVAGHI HAMID; VAFAEE NAJAR ALI; MERAJI MARZIYE; EBRAHIMIPOUR HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2015 | Volume:4 | Issue:10 Page(s): 645-651

Download Full-Text

View:

261

Download:

142

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

VALIDATING AND DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF ITEMS USED FOR EVALUATING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL

Author(s)

Keywords

VALIDATING

EVALUATION

IMPLEMENTATION

CLINICAL GOVERNANCE (CG)

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP)

Abstract

Background: The purpose of implementing a system such as Clinical Governance (CG) is to integrate, establish and globalize distinct policies in order to improve quality through increasing professional knowledge and the accountability of healthcare professional toward providing clinical excellence. Since CG is related to change, and change requires money and time, CG IMPLEMENTATION has to be focused on priority areas that are in more dire need of change. The purpose of the present study was to validate and determine the significance of items used for evaluating CG IMPLEMENTATION.Methods: The present study was descriptive-quantitative in method and design. Items used for evaluating CG IMPLEMENTATION were first validated by the Delphi method and then compared with one another and ranked based on the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model.Results: The items that were validated for evaluating CG IMPLEMENTATION in Iran include performance EVALUATION, training and development, personnel motivation, clinical audit, clinical effectiveness, risk management, resource allocation, policies and strategies, external audit, information system management, research and development, CG structure, IMPLEMENTATION prerequisites, the management of patients’ non-medical needs, complaints and patients’ participation in the treatment process. The most important items based on their degree of significance were training and development, performance EVALUATION, and risk management. The least important items included the management of patients’ non-medical needs, patients’ participation in the treatment process and research and development.Conclusion: The fundamental requirements of CG IMPLEMENTATION included having an effective policy at national level, avoiding perfectionism, using the expertise and potentials of the entire country and the coordination of this model with other models of quality improvement such as accreditation and patient safety.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

HOOSHMAND, ELAHEH, TOURANI, SOGAND, RAVAGHI, HAMID, VAFAEE NAJAR, ALI, MERAJI, MARZIYE, & EBRAHIMIPOUR, HOSSEIN. (2015). VALIDATING AND DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF ITEMS USED FOR EVALUATING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 4(10), 645-651. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338174/en

Vancouver: Copy

HOOSHMAND ELAHEH, TOURANI SOGAND, RAVAGHI HAMID, VAFAEE NAJAR ALI, MERAJI MARZIYE, EBRAHIMIPOUR HOSSEIN. VALIDATING AND DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF ITEMS USED FOR EVALUATING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2015;4(10):645-651. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338174/en

IEEE: Copy

ELAHEH HOOSHMAND, SOGAND TOURANI, HAMID RAVAGHI, ALI VAFAEE NAJAR, MARZIYE MERAJI, and HOSSEIN EBRAHIMIPOUR, “VALIDATING AND DETERMINING THE WEIGHT OF ITEMS USED FOR EVALUATING CLINICAL GOVERNANCE IMPLEMENTATION BASED ON ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS MODEL,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 645–651, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338174/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops