BEYOND THE BLACK BOX APPROACH TO ETHICS! COMMENT ON “EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY” (COMMENTARY)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SANDMAN LARS; GUSTAVSSON ERIK

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2016 | Volume:5 | Issue:6 Page(s): 393-394

Download Full-Text

View:

261

Download:

147

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

BEYOND THE BLACK BOX APPROACH TO ETHICS! COMMENT ON “EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY” (COMMENTARY)

Author(s)

SANDMAN LARS | GUSTAVSSON ERIK | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (HTA)

ACCOUNTABILITY FOR REASONABLENESS (A4R)

ETHICS

ETHICAL COMPETENCE

ETHICAL ANALYSIS

Abstract

In the editorial published in this journal, Daniels and colleagues argue that his and Sabin’s accountability for reasonableness (A4R) framework should be used to handle ethical issues in the health technology assessment (HTA) -process, especially concerning fairness. In contrast to this suggestion, it is argued that such an approach risks suffering from the irrrelevance or insufficiency they warn against. This is for a number of reasons: lack of comprehensiveness, lack of guidance for how to assess ethical issues within the "black box" of A4R as to issues covered, competence and legitimate arguments and finally seemingly accepting consensus as the final verdict on ethical issues. We argue that the HTA community is already in a position to move beyond this black box approach.

Cites

Moving Towards Accountability for Reasonableness – A Systematic Exploration of the Features of Legitimate Healthcare Coverage Decision-Making Processes Using Rare Diseases and Regenerative Therapies as a Case Study

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SANDMAN, LARS, & GUSTAVSSON, ERIK. (2016). BEYOND THE BLACK BOX APPROACH TO ETHICS! COMMENT ON “EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY” (COMMENTARY). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 5(6), 393-394. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338312/en

Vancouver: Copy

SANDMAN LARS, GUSTAVSSON ERIK. BEYOND THE BLACK BOX APPROACH TO ETHICS! COMMENT ON “EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY” (COMMENTARY). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2016;5(6):393-394. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338312/en

IEEE: Copy

LARS SANDMAN, and ERIK GUSTAVSSON, “BEYOND THE BLACK BOX APPROACH TO ETHICS! COMMENT ON “EXPANDED HTA: ENHANCING FAIRNESS AND LEGITIMACY” (COMMENTARY),” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 393–394, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338312/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops