IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO: CUSTOMIZATION AND STANDARDIZATION AS COLLUDING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE COMMENT ON “(RE) MAKING THE PROCRUSTEAN BED STANDARDIZATION AND CUSTOMIZATION AS COMPETING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE”

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GREENFIELD DAVID; ELJIZ KATHY; BUTLER HENDERSON KERRYN

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: International Journal of Health Policy and Management Year:2018 | Volume:7 | Issue:2 Page(s): 183-185

Download Full-Text

View:

182

Download:

128

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO: CUSTOMIZATION AND STANDARDIZATION AS COLLUDING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE COMMENT ON “(RE) MAKING THE PROCRUSTEAN BED STANDARDIZATION AND CUSTOMIZATION AS COMPETING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE”

Author(s)

GREENFIELD DAVID | ELJIZ KATHY | BUTLER HENDERSON KERRYN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

HEALTHCARE

STANDARDIZATION

CUSTOMIZATION

Abstract

The HEALTHCARE context is characterized with new developments, technologies, ideas and expectations that are continually reshaping the frontline of care delivery. Mannion and Exworthy identify two key factors driving this complexity, ‘standardization’ and ‘customization,’ and their apparent resulting paradox to be negotiated by HEALTHCARE professionals, managers and policy makers. However, while they present a compelling argument an alternative viewpoint exists. An analysis is presented that shows instead of being ‘competing’ logics in HEALTHCARE, STANDARDIZATION and CUSTOMIZATION are long standing ‘colluding’ logics. Mannion and Exworthy’s call for further sustained work to understand this complex, contested space is endorsed, noting that it is critical to inform future debates and service decisions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GREENFIELD, DAVID, ELJIZ, KATHY, & BUTLER HENDERSON, KERRYN. (2018). IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO: CUSTOMIZATION AND STANDARDIZATION AS COLLUDING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE COMMENT ON “(RE) MAKING THE PROCRUSTEAN BED STANDARDIZATION AND CUSTOMIZATION AS COMPETING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE”. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 7(2), 183-185. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338496/en

Vancouver: Copy

GREENFIELD DAVID, ELJIZ KATHY, BUTLER HENDERSON KERRYN. IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO: CUSTOMIZATION AND STANDARDIZATION AS COLLUDING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE COMMENT ON “(RE) MAKING THE PROCRUSTEAN BED STANDARDIZATION AND CUSTOMIZATION AS COMPETING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE”. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2018;7(2):183-185. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338496/en

IEEE: Copy

DAVID GREENFIELD, KATHY ELJIZ, and KERRYN BUTLER HENDERSON, “IT TAKES TWO TO TANGO: CUSTOMIZATION AND STANDARDIZATION AS COLLUDING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE COMMENT ON “(RE) MAKING THE PROCRUSTEAN BED STANDARDIZATION AND CUSTOMIZATION AS COMPETING LOGICS IN HEALTHCARE”,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 183–185, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338496/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops