Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

247
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

188
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

2

Information Journal Paper

Title

HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: GLOBAL ADVOCACY AND LOCAL REALITIES COMMENT ON "PRIORITY SETTING FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE: WE NEED EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES, NOT JUST MORE EVIDENCE ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS" (COMMENTARY)

Pages

  233-236

Keywords

COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS (CEA) 

Abstract

 Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) can help countries attain and sustain universal health coverage (UHC), as long as it is context-specific and considered within deliberative processes at the country level. Institutionalising robust deliberative processes requires significant time and resources, however, and countries often begin by demanding evidence (including local CEA evidence as well as evidence about local values), whilst striving to strengthen the GOVERNANCE structures and technical capacities with which to generate, consider and act on such evidence. In low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), such capacities could be developed initially around a small technical unit in the health ministry or health insurer. The role of networks, development partners, and global norm setting organisations is crucial in supporting the necessary capacities.

Cites

References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    CHALKIDOU, KALIPSO, LI, RYAN, CULYER, ANTHONY J., GLASSMAN, AMANDA, HOFMAN, KAREN J., & TEERAWATTANANON, YOT. (2017). HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: GLOBAL ADVOCACY AND LOCAL REALITIES COMMENT ON "PRIORITY SETTING FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE: WE NEED EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES, NOT JUST MORE EVIDENCE ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS" (COMMENTARY). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 6(4), 233-236. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338544/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    CHALKIDOU KALIPSO, LI RYAN, CULYER ANTHONY J., GLASSMAN AMANDA, HOFMAN KAREN J., TEERAWATTANANON YOT. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: GLOBAL ADVOCACY AND LOCAL REALITIES COMMENT ON "PRIORITY SETTING FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE: WE NEED EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES, NOT JUST MORE EVIDENCE ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS" (COMMENTARY). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2017;6(4):233-236. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338544/en

    IEEE: Copy

    KALIPSO CHALKIDOU, RYAN LI, ANTHONY J. CULYER, AMANDA GLASSMAN, KAREN J. HOFMAN, and YOT TEERAWATTANANON, “HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: GLOBAL ADVOCACY AND LOCAL REALITIES COMMENT ON "PRIORITY SETTING FOR UNIVERSAL HEALTH COVERAGE: WE NEED EVIDENCE-INFORMED DELIBERATIVE PROCESSES, NOT JUST MORE EVIDENCE ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS" (COMMENTARY),” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 233–236, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338544/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top