Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

219
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

102
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

From Craft to Reflective Art and Science (Comment on “ Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization-and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”)

Pages

  124-127

Abstract

 Patient engagement practices are increasingly incorporated in Health Research, governance, and care. More recently, a large number of Evaluation tools and metrics have been developed to support engagement Evaluation. This growing interest in Evaluation reflects a maturation of the patient engagement field, moving from a “ craft” to a reflective “ art and science, ” with more explicit expected benefits and risks, better understood conditions for success and failure, and increasingly rigorous Evaluation instruments to improve engagement theories and interventions. It also supports a more critical view of engagement science, moving beyond reductionist views of engagement as a “ black box technology” to a more subtle view of this broad category of complex interventions. Structured Evaluation can advance patient engagement by supporting more reflective partnerships between patients, clinicians, health system leaders and citizens. This can help clarify mutual (and potentially contradictory) expectations toward engagement, provide a reality check toward claims of benefits and harms, and increase health systems’ capacity to implement effective engagement practices over time. To do so, closer collaborations are required between engagement scientists and practitioners to align the theories, practice and Evaluation of patient and community engagement.

Cites

References

Cite

APA: Copy

Boivin, Antoine. (2019). From Craft to Reflective Art and Science (Comment on “ Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization-and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, 8(2), 124-127. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/338640/en

Vancouver: Copy

Boivin Antoine. From Craft to Reflective Art and Science (Comment on “ Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization-and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT[Internet]. 2019;8(2):124-127. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/338640/en

IEEE: Copy

Antoine Boivin, “From Craft to Reflective Art and Science (Comment on “ Metrics and Evaluation Tools for Patient Engagement in Healthcare Organization-and System-Level Decision-Making: A Systematic Review”),” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 124–127, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/338640/en

Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top