مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

466
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

175
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

CONFIRMING NASOGASTRIC TUBE POSITION: METHODS AND RESTRICTIONS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW (REVIEW ARTICLE)

Pages

  55-62

Abstract

 Background and Purpose: Inserting a NASOGASTRIC TUBE, though a common clinical procedure with widespread use for critically ill patients, can produce unexpected complications so that tube misplacement into the lungs is a potential complication with serious consequences. The reliability of common bedside methods to differentiate between pulmonary and gastric placement has not been acceptable. The goal of this study was to review the diagnostic accuracy of methods in detecting inadvertent airway intubation and verifying correct placement of NASOGASTRIC TUBE and restrictions.Methods: A review of Pub Med, Medline and CINAHL databases has been conducted to identify peer-reviewed, English language, human subject research studies published between the years 1994 and 2013.The research was conducted on the CONFIRMATION, methods and restrictions of NGT in the adult’s population. Out off 151 English publications, 29 were duplicates and 2 were animal studies. Quality assessments, data extractions and analysis were completed on all included studies.Results: Although methods for assessing correct NGT location at the bedside are available, each has its LIMITATIONS. The methods include auscultation (the most common method), PH testing of aspirates, capnography, insertion under direct vision and magnetic detection. All studies used X-rays as the reference standard for comparison since auscultation is unreliable.Conclusion: While none of the existing bedside methods for testing the position of NASOGASTRIC TUBEs is totally reliable, the evidence suggest that using more than one method for CONFIRMATION of NASOGASTRIC TUBE position is necessary.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAHIMI, MEHDI, FARHADI, KHOSRO, ASHTARIAN, HOSSEIN, & CHANGAEI, FRAHNAZ. (2015). CONFIRMING NASOGASTRIC TUBE POSITION: METHODS AND RESTRICTIONS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW (REVIEW ARTICLE). JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCES, 2(1), 55-62. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/341393/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAHIMI MEHDI, FARHADI KHOSRO, ASHTARIAN HOSSEIN, CHANGAEI FRAHNAZ. CONFIRMING NASOGASTRIC TUBE POSITION: METHODS AND RESTRICTIONS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW (REVIEW ARTICLE). JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCES[Internet]. 2015;2(1):55-62. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/341393/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MEHDI RAHIMI, KHOSRO FARHADI, HOSSEIN ASHTARIAN, and FRAHNAZ CHANGAEI, “CONFIRMING NASOGASTRIC TUBE POSITION: METHODS AND RESTRICTIONS: A NARRATIVE REVIEW (REVIEW ARTICLE),” JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY SCIENCES, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 55–62, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/341393/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button