MORPHOMETRIC CHANGES OF THE SOCKET AFTER SITE PRESERVATION USING NANOBONE AND COLLAGEN MEMBRANE OR STYPRO VERSUS EXTRACTION ALONE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SALAHI S.; ETEMADIFAR R.; MOOSAALI FERESHTEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF DENTAL BIOMATERIALS Year:2015 | Volume:2 | Issue:2 Page(s): 54-60

Download Full-Text

View:

325

Download:

154

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

MORPHOMETRIC CHANGES OF THE SOCKET AFTER SITE PRESERVATION USING NANOBONE AND COLLAGEN MEMBRANE OR STYPRO VERSUS EXTRACTION ALONE

Author(s)

SALAHI S. | ETEMADIFAR R. | MOOSAALI FERESHTEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SOCKET PRESERVATION

NANOBONE

STYPRO

COLLAGEN MEMBRANE

Abstract

Statement of Problem: The long-term success of a dental implant relies on implant osseointegration into native and viable bone, implant placement in an ideal position, and optimal hard and soft tissue contour. This requires the presence of sufficient alveolar bone volume, good alveolar ridge (Practically with no sign of atrophy) and good surgical technique.Objectives: The aim of this randomized controlled clinical study was to evaluate morphometric changes after different alveolar ridge preservation procedures.Materials and Methods: In this study, 33 patients who had single-rooted premolar, which needed to be extracted, were recruited. Patients were randomly divided into 3 groups and after tooth extraction the following treatments were administered: in group A: NANOBONE and a COLLAGEN MEMBRANE; in group B: NANOBONE and STYPRO; and in group C: natural healing. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at baseline and 6 months after the extraction: buccolingual width, midbuccal height (with the use of a custom made stent) and width of keratinized gingiva. For data analysis, Paired t-test, one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s tests were used.Results: The average reduction in the buccolingual width, midbuccal height and keratinized gingiva was as follows: group A: 1.18±0.6, 0.64±0.92 and 3.45±1.75 mm; group B: 2.18±0.75, 0.73±0.78 and 4.73±0.9 mm; and group C: 1±0.89, 2.36±1.21 and 5±0.63 mm, respectively. Moreover, a significantly reduced resorption was found in both the buccolingual width and the width of keratinized gingiva in group A as compared to groups B and C (p<0.05).Conclusions: This study showed that the use of COLLAGEN MEMBRANE+Nano bone (group A) can significantly reduce the horizontal resorption of the alveolar ridge and keratinized tissue more effectively than STYPRO+Nano bone (group B) and blood clot alone and natural healing (group C).

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SALAHI, S., ETEMADIFAR, R., & MOOSAALI, FERESHTEH. (2015). MORPHOMETRIC CHANGES OF THE SOCKET AFTER SITE PRESERVATION USING NANOBONE AND COLLAGEN MEMBRANE OR STYPRO VERSUS EXTRACTION ALONE. JOURNAL OF DENTAL BIOMATERIALS, 2(2), 54-60. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/343853/en

Vancouver: Copy

SALAHI S., ETEMADIFAR R., MOOSAALI FERESHTEH. MORPHOMETRIC CHANGES OF THE SOCKET AFTER SITE PRESERVATION USING NANOBONE AND COLLAGEN MEMBRANE OR STYPRO VERSUS EXTRACTION ALONE. JOURNAL OF DENTAL BIOMATERIALS[Internet]. 2015;2(2):54-60. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/343853/en

IEEE: Copy

S. SALAHI, R. ETEMADIFAR, and FERESHTEH MOOSAALI, “MORPHOMETRIC CHANGES OF THE SOCKET AFTER SITE PRESERVATION USING NANOBONE AND COLLAGEN MEMBRANE OR STYPRO VERSUS EXTRACTION ALONE,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL BIOMATERIALS, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 54–60, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/343853/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops