مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

277
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

202
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development

Pages

  257-268

Abstract

 control and prevent Air pollution, and improve the air quality. The plans reveal a picture of the current situation and available inventory information. However, in order to implement the identified plans in real life, they need to be prioritized. This study aimed to identify and prioritize clean air action plans for Turkey using a framework of both fuzzy and crisp evaluations. Methods: In this study, priorities of the plans were identified and analyzed with a decision-making model. A three-step research methodology was provided. First, literature was reviewed regarding sustainable development and action plans. Second, in order to narrow and specify action plans, the nominal group technique (NGT) was implemented. Finally, fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and best-worst method (BWM) surveys were applied to environmental engineers and experts working on sustainable development to prioritize the action plans. Results: It was revealed that heating dimension is considered as the most important criterion with the weight of 0. 7469 in fuzzy AHP and 0. 758 in BWM. AP1 with a weight of 0. 3356 in fuzzy AHP and AP3 with a weight of 0. 3289 in BWM were the most important sub-criteria, which are the plans for reducing coal use ranked at the forefront in reducing Air pollution. Conclusion: According to the results, there is no significant difference in the priority ranking results. The results of fuzzy AHP and BWM are very similar. For example, traffic criterion has the best performance in both methods in the evaluation of decision makers. In addition, the main and sub-criteria with the lowest priority are the same in these two methods.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

    Cite

    APA: Copy

    Cal?k, Ahmet. (2019). Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENGINEERING AND MANAGMENT JOURNAL, 6(4), 257-268. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/349016/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Cal?k Ahmet. Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENGINEERING AND MANAGMENT JOURNAL[Internet]. 2019;6(4):257-268. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/349016/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Ahmet Cal?k, “Comparison of decision-making approaches to prioritization of clean air action plans for sustainable development,” ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH ENGINEERING AND MANAGMENT JOURNAL, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 257–268, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/349016/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button