SELF-, PEER-, AND TEACHER-ASSESSMENTS IN WRITING IMPROVEMENT: A STUDY OF COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, AND FLUENCY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SOLEIMANI HASSAN; RAHMANIAN MAHBOUBEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS Year:2014 | Volume:5 | Issue:2 Page(s): 128-148

Download Full-Text

View:

196

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

SELF-, PEER-, AND TEACHER-ASSESSMENTS IN WRITING IMPROVEMENT: A STUDY OF COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, AND FLUENCY

Author(s)

SOLEIMANI HASSAN | RAHMANIAN MAHBOUBEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

SELF-ASSESSMENT

PEER-ASSESSMENT

TEACHER-ASSESSMENT

COMPLEXITY

ACCURACY

FLUENCY (CAF)

WRITING PERFORMANCE

Abstract

Alternative assessment approaches and, among them, SELF-ASSESSMENT and peer assessment are becoming increasingly important in educational contexts. Designed to compare SELF-ASSESSMENT, PEER-ASSESSMENT, and TEACHER-ASSESSMENT, this study included 90 EFL students from 3 intact classes divided into 3 groups: selfassessment, PEER-ASSESSMENT, and TEACHER-ASSESSMENT. After taking the TOEFL Proficiency Test (2004) and a writing pretest asking the participants to write a 150-word paragraph, the participants were trained upon the writing COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, and fluency (CAF) scale of Wolfe-Quintero et al. (1998). Before sitting the 2 posttests requiring the participants to write a 150-word paragraph, the selfassessment and PEER-ASSESSMENT groups assessed their own and peers’ writings, respectively, whereas the third group had their teacher assess their writings. Results of one-way ANOVA demonstrated that TEACHER-ASSESSMENT was not as effective as SELF-ASSESSMENT and PEER-ASSESSMENT in terms of enhancing their writing proficiency. Results have important implications for educational organizations and curriculum designers who look for the most appropriate methods of teaching and testing.

Multimedia

No record.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SOLEIMANI, HASSAN, & RAHMANIAN, MAHBOUBEH. (2014). SELF-, PEER-, AND TEACHER-ASSESSMENTS IN WRITING IMPROVEMENT: A STUDY OF COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, AND FLUENCY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 5(2), 128-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/351905/en

Vancouver: Copy

SOLEIMANI HASSAN, RAHMANIAN MAHBOUBEH. SELF-, PEER-, AND TEACHER-ASSESSMENTS IN WRITING IMPROVEMENT: A STUDY OF COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, AND FLUENCY. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS[Internet]. 2014;5(2):128-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/351905/en

IEEE: Copy

HASSAN SOLEIMANI, and MAHBOUBEH RAHMANIAN, “SELF-, PEER-, AND TEACHER-ASSESSMENTS IN WRITING IMPROVEMENT: A STUDY OF COMPLEXITY, ACCURACY, AND FLUENCY,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 128–148, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/351905/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops