THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FARABI'S AND IBN-RUSHD'S THEORIES ON THE COMPATIBITLITY OF HIKAMT AND SHARI'AT

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MALAYERI M.

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NAMEH-YE-MOFID Year:2003 | Volume:8 | Issue:6 (34 PHILOSOPHY) Page(s): 131-148

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

889

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FARABI'S AND IBN-RUSHD'S THEORIES ON THE COMPATIBITLITY OF HIKAMT AND SHARI'AT

Author(s)

MALAYERI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

After the appearance of the philosophy in the field of Islamic culture, the feeling of contradiction between religion and philosophy made Muslem thinkers take different Positions. Some of them left philosophy behind themselves and rejected it, and a few of them preferred philosophy to religion, but a thinker as Farabi founded a new philosophical school in which the Revelation was considered as knowledge, which was expressed in philosophical method. And therefore it became clear that the wisdom and religion had the same origin, and there was no contradiction between them. After Farabi, Avecien competed his theory and increased important elements to it but Averose, because of his dogmatic emphasis on Aristotalian philosophy, revived it. The philosophy which Averose revived was irrelevant to the spirit of Islamic philosophy and was not capable of philosophical expression of Revelation as supernatural and unexperimental knowledge.And despairingly of his philosophy, by reliance of juristic and theological presuppositions, in his book named "Fasl al Maghal" his attempt was unsuccessful for connection between wisdom and religion, which has been criticized in present essay.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MALAYERI, M.. (2003). THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FARABI'S AND IBN-RUSHD'S THEORIES ON THE COMPATIBITLITY OF HIKAMT AND SHARI'AT. NAMEH-YE-MOFID, 8(6 (34 PHILOSOPHY)), 131-148. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/3526/en

Vancouver: Copy

MALAYERI M.. THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FARABI'S AND IBN-RUSHD'S THEORIES ON THE COMPATIBITLITY OF HIKAMT AND SHARI'AT. NAMEH-YE-MOFID[Internet]. 2003;8(6 (34 PHILOSOPHY)):131-148. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/3526/en

IEEE: Copy

M. MALAYERI, “THE ESSENTIAL DIFFERENCE BETWEEN FARABI'S AND IBN-RUSHD'S THEORIES ON THE COMPATIBITLITY OF HIKAMT AND SHARI'AT,” NAMEH-YE-MOFID, vol. 8, no. 6 (34 PHILOSOPHY), pp. 131–148, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/3526/en

Related Journal Papers