مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

188
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

195
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and Sure-Seal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy

Pages

  27-32

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Tubular penetration of root canal sealers prevents filling material displacement and overgrowth of microorganisms in Dentinal tubules. The aim of this study was to compare the tubular penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and SureSeal sealers in single-rooted teeth using Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Materials and Methods: Fifty human single-rooted teeth were included in this experimental study. After Root Canal Preparation, AH26 was used in group 1, EasySeal was used in group 2, and SureSeal was used in group 3 using the lateral condensation technique. Sections at 3 mm and 6 mm from the apex were prepared and subjected to SEM analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc and paired t-tests were used to compare the deepest Dentinal penetration of root canal sealers. Results: The deepest tubular penetration at 3 mm from the apex was 0. 85± 0. 19 mm in group 1, 1. 32± 0. 21 mm in group 2, and 1. 17± 0. 42 mm in group 3; the difference was significant (P=0. 01). The deepest tubular penetration at 6 mm from the apex was 1. 09± 0. 3 mm in group 1, 2. 12± 0. 45 mm in group 2, and 1. 88± 0. 43 mm in group 3; the difference was significant (P=0. 0001). The mean deepest tubular penetration was lower at 3 mm from the apex compared to the penetration at 6 mm from the apex (P=0. 02). Conclusion: It seems that tubular penetration of AH26 sealer is less than that of EasySeal and SureSeal at 3-mm and 6-mm sections.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    Tour Savadkouhi, S., ZAMENI, F., & AFKAR, M.. (2018). Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and Sure-Seal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, 3(3), 27-32. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/354512/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    Tour Savadkouhi S., ZAMENI F., AFKAR M.. Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and Sure-Seal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES[Internet]. 2018;3(3):27-32. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/354512/en

    IEEE: Copy

    S. Tour Savadkouhi, F. ZAMENI, and M. AFKAR, “Comparison of Tubular Penetration of AH26, EasySeal, and Sure-Seal Root Canal Sealers in Single-Rooted Teeth Using Scanning Electron Microscopy,” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN DENTAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SCIENCES, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 27–32, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/354512/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button