COMPARISON OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION IN COVERING ROOT SURFACES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

LOTF AZAR M.; FAGHIHI SH.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Dental Medicine Year:2002 | Volume:15 | Issue:3 (32) Page(s): 55-65

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

908

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION IN COVERING ROOT SURFACES

Author(s)

LOTF AZAR M. | FAGHIHI SH. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

GINGIVAL RECESSIONQ4

THERAPYQ2

GINGIVAL RECESSIONQ4

SURGERYQ3

GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATIONQ4

GRAFTSQ4

CONNECTIVE TISSUEQ3

Abstract

There are many researches evaluation different methods for covering the root surface. In the most of these studies, type I and II of Miller treatment had been searched. The purpose of this study was a comparison between CONNECTIVE TISSUE graft (CTG) and GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION (GTR) with a collagen membrane in the treatment of GINGIVAL RECESSION defects (Miller class III). Six patients, each contributing a pair of Miller class III buccal GINGIVAL RECESSIONs, were treated. The clinical measurements were obtained at baseline and 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18 months after SURGERY. Statistical analysis were performed using paired t-test between periods (baseline versus 6 months and baseline versus 18 months) within each treatment group and also between treatment groups before treatment and 6, 12 and 18 months after the treatment. The treatments were compared by a triple analysis of variance along the time (treatment, patient, time). Both CTG and GTR with a bioabsorbable membrane demonstrated significant clinical and esthetic improvement for GINGIVAL RECESSION coverage. The CTG and GTR procedures had mean root coverage of 55% and 47.5% respectively, in the end of study. The CTG group was statistically better than GTR for recession depth, recession width and keratinized tissue width. Also, passing the time (18 months) as a distinct factor of treatment procedures was effective in increasing of clinical attachment level and keratinized tissue width.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

LOTF AZAR, M., & FAGHIHI, SH.. (2002). COMPARISON OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION IN COVERING ROOT SURFACES. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, 15(3 (32)), 55-65. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/357082/en

Vancouver: Copy

LOTF AZAR M., FAGHIHI SH.. COMPARISON OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION IN COVERING ROOT SURFACES. JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE[Internet]. 2002;15(3 (32)):55-65. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/357082/en

IEEE: Copy

M. LOTF AZAR, and SH. FAGHIHI, “COMPARISON OF CONNECTIVE TISSUE GRAFT AND GUIDED TISSUE REGENERATION IN COVERING ROOT SURFACES,” JOURNAL OF DENTAL MEDICINE, vol. 15, no. 3 (32), pp. 55–65, 2002, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/357082/en

Related Journal Papers