مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

2,117
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Jurisprudential Explanation of the Principle of the Prohibition of Multiplicity of Objection to Authenticity of Deed and Claim of Payment

Pages

  89-113

Abstract

 By bringing an action to the court, a kind of legal relationship is created between the parties to a dispute. People in this legal relationship sometimes state an objection to the authenticity of the deed before, after, or simultaneous with the claim of payment. The principle of the prohibition of the multiplicity of the objection to the authenticity of the deed is one of the important and notable topics in civil law which attracts the attention of every reader. This principle is stated in the second part of Article 228 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The question of the present study is whether it is possible to deal with the authenticity of the deed from the jurisprudential and legal point of view if the objection is made before, after, or simultaneous with the claim of payment. Research and investigation in jurisprudential and legal sources and identification of common and specific bases of this principle yielded the conclusion that given the circumstances, it can be said that an objection to the authenticity of a deed can be stated before, after, and simultaneous with the claim of payment; otherwise, it is impossible to state the case simultaneously or consecutively. Also, by specifying the grounds for this principle, the purpose of the legislator from the enactment of Article 228 Civil Procedure can be discovered and provide answers to the questions raised in this regard. The present study aims to provide a jurisprudenctial examination of the subject by studying the basics of the issue in Islamic law and jurisprudence and substantive law.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HASANZADEH, MAHDI, & ghahremani, jila. (2020). Jurisprudential Explanation of the Principle of the Prohibition of Multiplicity of Objection to Authenticity of Deed and Claim of Payment. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, 16(59 ), 89-113. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/358543/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HASANZADEH MAHDI, ghahremani jila. Jurisprudential Explanation of the Principle of the Prohibition of Multiplicity of Objection to Authenticity of Deed and Claim of Payment. JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES[Internet]. 2020;16(59 ):89-113. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/358543/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MAHDI HASANZADEH, and jila ghahremani, “Jurisprudential Explanation of the Principle of the Prohibition of Multiplicity of Objection to Authenticity of Deed and Claim of Payment,” JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE RESEARCHES, vol. 16, no. 59 , pp. 89–113, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/358543/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button