مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,000
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE EFFECT OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE "THEORY OF CHANGING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVIDENCES” IN THE ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE OVERLAPPING OF THE PERIOD OF WAITING (IDDAH)

Pages

  0-0

Keywords

IDDAH (PERIOD OF WAITING)Q1

Abstract

 In several cases there are two sources for the period of waiting. There is a dispute between jurists in these cases as to whether it is obligatory or necessary for the divorcee to wait and looked out for two periods of waiting (Iddah) or one, or that the waiting period does not overlap. This dispute is due to the conflict of evidence. On the other hand, when there are two pieces of evidence and there is an established conflict over the two that should be resolved and a third evidence changes this conflict between them to absolute generality with its entrance, there is no single opinion on the quality of the conflict resolution. Some great fundamentalists do not accept the “theory of changing the relationship between these pieces of evidence” while some have accepted it, while others have accepted it in light of the third evidence and under its terms. In this article, which has used the analytical method, relying on first-hand jurisprudential and fundamental sources, we argue that one of the origins of the difference in the rules of the interference of a number of differences in the acceptance of the above theory. Thus, by accepting the theory and evaluation of the first group contrariquent evidence with the second group, its proportion to the third group has changed from the evidence, and from the contradiction to the general and absolute, and the possibility of allocation and aggregation of the dealership is provided.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    RAZAVI, SEYED MOHAMMAD. (2017). THE EFFECT OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE "THEORY OF CHANGING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVIDENCES” IN THE ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE OVERLAPPING OF THE PERIOD OF WAITING (IDDAH). FAMILY LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE (NEDAYE SADIQ), 22(66), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/358922/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    RAZAVI SEYED MOHAMMAD. THE EFFECT OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE "THEORY OF CHANGING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVIDENCES” IN THE ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE OVERLAPPING OF THE PERIOD OF WAITING (IDDAH). FAMILY LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE (NEDAYE SADIQ)[Internet]. 2017;22(66):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/358922/en

    IEEE: Copy

    SEYED MOHAMMAD RAZAVI, “THE EFFECT OF THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE "THEORY OF CHANGING OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EVIDENCES” IN THE ORDINANCES CONCERNING THE OVERLAPPING OF THE PERIOD OF WAITING (IDDAH),” FAMILY LAW AND JURISPRUDENCE (NEDAYE SADIQ), vol. 22, no. 66, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/358922/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button