The Comparison of Survival of Diced, Crushed, and Block Ear Cartilage Grafts in Rabbit

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Iranpour Maryam; KHODARAHMI ALI; Purrashidi Aboozar; Mirshafiee Mohammad; Abazari Omid; Movahedinia Sajjadeh; Movahedinia Safaneh

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Isfahan Medical School Year:2019 | Volume:37 | Issue:520 Page(s): 249-255

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

420

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Comparison of Survival of Diced, Crushed, and Block Ear Cartilage Grafts in Rabbit

Author(s)

Keywords

CartilageQ2

AutograftQ2

Survival rateQ3

Abstract

Background: Cartilage grafts are used in plastic surgery in restorations that require strength. Due to varying degrees of strength in these regenerations, Cartilage grafts from different sources are used in block, crushed, and diced forms. The aim of this study was to compare the Survival rate of in crushed, diced, and block Autograft Cartilage forms of rabbit ear. Methods: This study was performed on 36 New Zealand white male rabbits weighing 2000 to 2500 grams and aged 12 to 16 weeks. The Cartilage of the right ear of each rabbit was harvested, and three graft samples of crushed, diced, and block forms were obtained. The grafts were put in three separate subcutaneous envelopes adjacent to the rabbit’ s backbone. After 3 months, the specimens were removed, stained with hematoxylin and eosinophil (H & E), and histologically examined. Findings: The mean graft weight increased in all groups using crushed, diced, and block Cartilage forms, but it was not statistically significant. There was a significant difference between the different methods in terms of the amount of fibrosis (P = 0. 002), ossification (P < 0. 001), and chondrocyte (P = 0. 002); so that the percentage of the live chondrocytes was significantly higher in the block group. Conclusion: Results show that block Cartilage grafts are more reliable than diced and crushed types in the formation of various facial and nasal regions.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Iranpour, Maryam, KHODARAHMI, ALI, Purrashidi, Aboozar, Mirshafiee, Mohammad, Abazari, Omid, Movahedinia, Sajjadeh, & Movahedinia, Safaneh. (2019). The Comparison of Survival of Diced, Crushed, and Block Ear Cartilage Grafts in Rabbit. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), 37(520 ), 249-255. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/362505/en

Vancouver: Copy

Iranpour Maryam, KHODARAHMI ALI, Purrashidi Aboozar, Mirshafiee Mohammad, Abazari Omid, Movahedinia Sajjadeh, Movahedinia Safaneh. The Comparison of Survival of Diced, Crushed, and Block Ear Cartilage Grafts in Rabbit. JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S)[Internet]. 2019;37(520 ):249-255. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/362505/en

IEEE: Copy

Maryam Iranpour, ALI KHODARAHMI, Aboozar Purrashidi, Mohammad Mirshafiee, Omid Abazari, Sajjadeh Movahedinia, and Safaneh Movahedinia, “The Comparison of Survival of Diced, Crushed, and Block Ear Cartilage Grafts in Rabbit,” JOURNAL OF ISFAHAN MEDICAL SCHOOL (I.U.M.S), vol. 37, no. 520 , pp. 249–255, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/362505/en

Related Journal Papers