Traditional Interpretation of Early Wittgenstein and Negative-Theological Reading of It

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SADEGHI ALI; AKBARI REZA

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ) Year:2020 | Volume:8 | Issue:2 Page(s): 63-85

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

256

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Traditional Interpretation of Early Wittgenstein and Negative-Theological Reading of It

Author(s)

SADEGHI ALI | AKBARI REZA | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Early WittgensteinQ1

NonsenseQ1

Traditional InterpretationQ1

Ineffable TruthsQ1

Negative theologyQ2

Abstract

Within Tractatus and other works related to Wittgenstein's early philosophy, the concept of "Nonsense" is a central one and of great importancem which was the subject of several interpretations. Among them, traditional (metaphysical) interpretation is a lasting one which P. M. S. Hacker, G. E. M. Anscombe and Hans-Johann Glock are its major figures. According to this interpretation, Wittgenstein maintains that there are a kind of truth which are "ineffable", including ethical and religious truths. Also, there are commentators who has used this kind of truth to conclude that Wittgenstein could (or should) be considered as continuing the Negative theology tradition. In this paper, after articulation of Traditional Interpretation, the relation between Wittgenstein and Negative theology will be studied. In the end, we will pose some critical remarks to show that, despite some priliminary similarities, not only Wittgenstein's philosophy has nothing to do with Negative theology, but it is in a totally different direction than Negative theology, even against it.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SADEGHI, ALI, & AKBARI, REZA. (2020). Traditional Interpretation of Early Wittgenstein and Negative-Theological Reading of It. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), 8(2 ), 63-85. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/364803/en

Vancouver: Copy

SADEGHI ALI, AKBARI REZA. Traditional Interpretation of Early Wittgenstein and Negative-Theological Reading of It. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES )[Internet]. 2020;8(2 ):63-85. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/364803/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI SADEGHI, and REZA AKBARI, “Traditional Interpretation of Early Wittgenstein and Negative-Theological Reading of It,” JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), vol. 8, no. 2 , pp. 63–85, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/364803/en

Related Journal Papers