مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

478
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

The Comparative Efficacy of Kalami and Rhetorical Exegesis in Understanding Aliment

Pages

  263-288

Keywords

Haram (unlawful) aliment 

Abstract

 Consciously or unconsciously, Shi’ ite, Mo’ tazila, and ‘ Ashari commentators have consistently been affected by their own Kalami presumption during the exegetic history of the Noble Quran. One of the issues in this regard is the possibility or impossibility of Haram aliment. In order to investigate this exegetic subject, first historical origins on how it entered the Quranic exegesis should be illuminated through historical study. Then, we should achieve a new and valid understanding of this term using linguistic devices such as etymology and semantics. The study of the history of Islam indicates that unlawful withholding of Muslims’ property especially public aliment by Othman ibn Affan is one of the most important causes which led to his killing. In the 2nd century A. H., this issue turned to a serious Kalami argument between Shi’ ite and ‘ Ash’ ari denominations. In that historical period, it has been attempted to justify the unlawful withholding of Muslim’ s property by the third Caliph using justification such as justice of Sahabe (companions), determinism, and references to the Quran. The etymological and semantic study of the term “ aliment” shows that none of the exegetic and terminological books have surveyed the origin of this term because they were affected by the above mentioned serious argument. The etymology of “ aliment” reveals that benevolence and mercy are key concepts in this term. The semantic investigation of “ aliment” shows that this term in the Noble Quran means giving gift and it cannot be applied for Haram property. Using this method, represents new and valid evidence from the Noble Quran rejecting the possibility of Haram aliment.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    HOSEINI, BIBI ZEINAB, FAZELI, ALIREZA, & Moosavi Pooya, Seyed Roohollah. (2018). The Comparative Efficacy of Kalami and Rhetorical Exegesis in Understanding Aliment. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, 4(1 (7) ), 263-288. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/365098/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    HOSEINI BIBI ZEINAB, FAZELI ALIREZA, Moosavi Pooya Seyed Roohollah. The Comparative Efficacy of Kalami and Rhetorical Exegesis in Understanding Aliment. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES[Internet]. 2018;4(1 (7) ):263-288. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/365098/en

    IEEE: Copy

    BIBI ZEINAB HOSEINI, ALIREZA FAZELI, and Seyed Roohollah Moosavi Pooya, “The Comparative Efficacy of Kalami and Rhetorical Exegesis in Understanding Aliment,” JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE TAFSIR STUDIES, vol. 4, no. 1 (7) , pp. 263–288, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/365098/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button