مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,693
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND HYDROSONOHYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF THE UTERINE CAVITY AND FALLOPIAN TUBES IN INFERTILE WOMEN

Pages

  36-40

Abstract

 Objective: Comparison of two methods of HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY (HSG) and HYDROSONOHYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY (HSHSG) for the evaluation of the uterine cavity and FALLOPIAN TUBES in infertile women. Method (s): Fifty infertile women were choses by blind comparative study. All patients underwent standard HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY by one radiologist and then underwent hydrosonography, by one Gynecologist.For hydrosonography, the first 2-3cc sterile normal saline was injected to visualize the uterine cavity, followed by injection of 10cc saline to check tubal patency and spillage. The instruments of injection were foli catheter No 5.5 or IDI catheter. For visualization we used vaginal sonography for comparision of the results of these two methods. All patients underwent laparascopy /hysteroscopy as a gold standard method.Results: Pain and spotting in HSHSG was significantly less than the HSG (10% vs 60%). Nine patients (18%) had tubal occlusion with HSHSG and eleven patients (22%) had HSG. Uterine intracurvitary abnormalities (endometrial polyps...) were imaged in 3 patients with HSHSG. The results of laparascopy /hysteroscopy showed that there were 4 false tubal occlusions in HSG.Conclusion(s): HSHSG is an easy, repetitious and without side effect method. It can be provided by specialized Gynecologists, It does not need x-ray, and for evaluation of the uterine cavity and pelvic .f1oorit has high sensitivity and specifity.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAGHAFI, N., & SEYFOLLAHI, F.. (2003). COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND HYDROSONOHYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF THE UTERINE CAVITY AND FALLOPIAN TUBES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, 6(1), 36-40. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/365787/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAGHAFI N., SEYFOLLAHI F.. COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND HYDROSONOHYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF THE UTERINE CAVITY AND FALLOPIAN TUBES IN INFERTILE WOMEN. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY[Internet]. 2003;6(1):36-40. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/365787/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N. SAGHAFI, and F. SEYFOLLAHI, “COMPARISON OF TWO METHODS OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND HYDROSONOHYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY IN EVALUATION OF THE UTERINE CAVITY AND FALLOPIAN TUBES IN INFERTILE WOMEN,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS, GYNECOLOGY AND INFERTILITY, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36–40, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/365787/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button