A Comparative Study of the Views of al-Shaykh al-Raʾ ī s and Shaykh al-Ishraq on the Quiddity of Pleasure

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Shojaee Baghini Hoorieh; KHADEMI EINOLLAH; SALAVATI ABDOLLAH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Avicennian Philosophy Journal Year:2020 | Volume:24 | Issue:63 Page(s): 133-152

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

338

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A Comparative Study of the Views of al-Shaykh al-Raʾ ī s and Shaykh al-Ishraq on the Quiddity of Pleasure

Author(s)

Shojaee Baghini Hoorieh | KHADEMI EINOLLAH | SALAVATI ABDOLLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PleasureQ2

PerceptionQ2

Appropriate (agreeable to one's nature)Q1

knowledge by acquaintanceQ2

knowledge by presenceQ2

AvicennaQ2

SuhrawardiQ2

Abstract

Avicenna and Suhrawardi have brief and scattered discussions about the issue of Pleasure in their various works. One of those topics is the views of the two thinkers on the quiddity of Pleasure. Thus, the purpose of this paper is a comparative study of Pleasure from viewpoints of the heads of the two schools of Peripatetic and Illuminationist philosophy and according to their epistemological and ontological bases. The problem of Pleasure is a small part of the epistemic network of the two schools of Peripateticism and Illuminationism. Therefore, to get a better understanding and a deeper Perception of the issue, it is necessary to review other aspects of the network, such as the basis of their philosophy. One of the implications of this study is to understand the reason that Ibn Sina distinct between transcendent and human Pleasure, while there is no such distinction in Suhrawardi's philosophy, due to their difference in the issue of existence and Perception of quiddity in their philosophical systems. Another implication is that although 'Perception' and 'appropriate'(agreeable to one's nature) are consistent and repetitive terms in definitions of Pleasure, given the epistemological and ontological differences of the two schools in their explanation, we come to a different understanding of Pleasure. The most important of these differences are: from the epistemological perspective in Peripateticism, the emphasis is on knowledge by acquaintance. According to Illuminationism, however, the Perception is based on the knowledge by presence. Also, the basis of ontology in Peripatetic philosophy is existence, but in the philosophy of illumination, the basis is light.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Shojaee Baghini, Hoorieh, KHADEMI, EINOLLAH, & SALAVATI, ABDOLLAH. (2020). A Comparative Study of the Views of al-Shaykh al-Raʾ ī s and Shaykh al-Ishraq on the Quiddity of Pleasure. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, 24(63 ), 133-152. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/367287/en

Vancouver: Copy

Shojaee Baghini Hoorieh, KHADEMI EINOLLAH, SALAVATI ABDOLLAH. A Comparative Study of the Views of al-Shaykh al-Raʾ ī s and Shaykh al-Ishraq on the Quiddity of Pleasure. AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL[Internet]. 2020;24(63 ):133-152. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/367287/en

IEEE: Copy

Hoorieh Shojaee Baghini, EINOLLAH KHADEMI, and ABDOLLAH SALAVATI, “A Comparative Study of the Views of al-Shaykh al-Raʾ ī s and Shaykh al-Ishraq on the Quiddity of Pleasure,” AVICINIAN PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL, vol. 24, no. 63 , pp. 133–152, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/367287/en

Related Journal Papers