مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

703
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

1

Information Journal Paper

Title

Assessment and critical comparison of Tabataba'i, Motahari and Javadi Amoli's views on the unity of existence and its theological elements

Pages

  91-109

Abstract

 One of the important issues in the philosophy of religion is the issue of the unity of the world and its relation to the unity of God. These different perceptions of the unity of the universe have been challenged by the Unity of existence. In this paper, we are going to elucidate the viewpoints of the Muslim philosophers of the Transcendent Philosophy School with this discussion and evaluate their arguments and show the superiority of some of the views of others. In this regard, the viewpoints of Sadr's wisdom commentators who have contradictory opinions have been selected and their analysis has been analyzed. . Allameh Tabatabai, who is sometimes inclined to some form of unity, sometimes personal, sometimes also interprets the two-word consistency. Ultimately, he accepts the solid arguments of personal unity, but he does not have the ability to answer doubts. Motahari, who opposes the Unity of existence, negation, negation, and neglect of possible possibilities, ultimately, by Allameh Javadi Amoli, with the proof of the "Absolute Absolute" and placing "being" and "appearing" against "lack of" defects that prevent the application of philosophy based on unity Were eliminated, so the way to change many topics was opened. In this paper, we intend to have a critical comparison of the views of these three thinkers.

Cites

References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    rezaie, marzieh, ayatollahi, hamireza, & SAEEDIMEHR, MOHAMMAD. (2018). Assessment and critical comparison of Tabataba'i, Motahari and Javadi Amoli's views on the unity of existence and its theological elements. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), 7(1 ), 91-109. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/369627/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    rezaie marzieh, ayatollahi hamireza, SAEEDIMEHR MOHAMMAD. Assessment and critical comparison of Tabataba'i, Motahari and Javadi Amoli's views on the unity of existence and its theological elements. JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES )[Internet]. 2018;7(1 ):91-109. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/369627/en

    IEEE: Copy

    marzieh rezaie, hamireza ayatollahi, and MOHAMMAD SAEEDIMEHR, “Assessment and critical comparison of Tabataba'i, Motahari and Javadi Amoli's views on the unity of existence and its theological elements,” JOSTARHA-YE FALSAFE-YE DIN (PHILOSOPHY OF RELIGION STUDIES ), vol. 7, no. 1 , pp. 91–109, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/369627/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button