مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

1,290
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF "READ-RIVES" AND ''LICHTENSTEIN'' REPAIR FOR TREATMENT OF UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA

Pages

  57-61

Abstract

 Introduction: ''Lichtenstein'' tension-free MESH REPAIR is the most common surgical techniques used for INGUINAL HERNIA repair." Read-Rives" method is tension-free, too, but here prosthesis is placed just over the peritoneum, and there is no weak area. The aim of this study was to compare the results of "Read-Rives" and Lichtenstein method in the hernioplasty.Methods and Materials: In this prospective randomized clinical trial 126 patients who had unilateral INGUINAL HERNIA were examined: 64 patients operated with Lichtenstein and 62 patients operated with Rives method. They evaluated for early post-operative complications, duration of surgery and hospital stay, return to normal activity, and then they followed for recurrence of hernia.Results: Postoperative pain was significantly lower and the return to normal activity was shorter in Rives group. Duration of surgery and hospital stay and recurrence rate was equal, lower postoperative wound infection was found within Rives method.Conclusions: Although the ''Read-Rives'' method is not technically as simple as ''Lichtenstein'' method, but this procedure is easy to learn, so it is recommended because of its better final outcome in comparison with LICHTENSTEIN REPAIR.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AKHAVAN MOGHADDAM, JAMAL, MEHRVARZ, SHABAN, MOHEBBI, HASSAN ALI, & PANAHIE, FARZAD. (2011). COMPARISON OF "READ-RIVES" AND ''LICHTENSTEIN'' REPAIR FOR TREATMENT OF UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA. KOOMESH, 13(1(41)), 57-61. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/37049/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AKHAVAN MOGHADDAM JAMAL, MEHRVARZ SHABAN, MOHEBBI HASSAN ALI, PANAHIE FARZAD. COMPARISON OF "READ-RIVES" AND ''LICHTENSTEIN'' REPAIR FOR TREATMENT OF UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA. KOOMESH[Internet]. 2011;13(1(41)):57-61. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/37049/en

    IEEE: Copy

    JAMAL AKHAVAN MOGHADDAM, SHABAN MEHRVARZ, HASSAN ALI MOHEBBI, and FARZAD PANAHIE, “COMPARISON OF "READ-RIVES" AND ''LICHTENSTEIN'' REPAIR FOR TREATMENT OF UNILATERAL INGUINAL HERNIA,” KOOMESH, vol. 13, no. 1(41), pp. 57–61, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/37049/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button