How confusing an assessment might be? a case study in borderline personality disorder

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Hakimnia Mahmoud; RAFEZI ZOHREH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

609

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

How confusing an assessment might be? a case study in borderline personality disorder

Author(s)

Hakimnia Mahmoud | RAFEZI ZOHREH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DiagnosisQ2

borderline personality disorderQ1

Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-IIIQ1

structured clinical interviewQ1

Abstract

Background: Accurate Diagnosis especially in personality disorders has been always challenging to select the most appropriate intervention method. However, the consistency between diagnostic methods based on patient's self-report and methods based on the evaluation of clinicians is not satisfactory. Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the consistency of diagnostic method based on clinician's evaluation and the method based on the patient's self-report to select the most appropriate diagnostic method. Method: The present study was a clinical case study. The data were obtained from a 30-year-old male client using structured clinical interview (SCID-II; First et al., 1994), Millon clinical multiaxial inventory-III (MCMI-III; Millon, 1994), and unstructured interview assessment tools, and were explanatorily analyzed. Results: According to the results, the client was diagnosed with borderline personality disorder to the SCID-II, and despite the profile validity, there was found no elevation at the borderline scale of the MCMI-III. Conclusions: No appropriate consistency was found between the method based on the evaluation of clinician and selfreport-based method in this case study. In general, the results of the present study indicated that known and valid tests will not always lead to reliable results and the combination of several sources of evaluation is more appropriate and effective and result in more reliable results.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Hakimnia, Mahmoud, & RAFEZI, ZOHREH. (2021). How confusing an assessment might be? a case study in borderline personality disorder. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 20(98 ), 259-268. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/374028/en

Vancouver: Copy

Hakimnia Mahmoud, RAFEZI ZOHREH. How confusing an assessment might be? a case study in borderline personality disorder. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE[Internet]. 2021;20(98 ):259-268. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/374028/en

IEEE: Copy

Mahmoud Hakimnia, and ZOHREH RAFEZI, “How confusing an assessment might be? a case study in borderline personality disorder,” JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, vol. 20, no. 98 , pp. 259–268, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/374028/en

Related Journal Papers