مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

804
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF AMPLITUDE & LATENCY OF AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND NORMALLY SIGHTED SUBJECTS IN THE RANGE OF 14-20 YRS

Pages

  49-55

Abstract

 Background and Aim: Auditory and visual stimuli are the most important factors in communication. It seems during the brain maturation, decrease of visual inputs causes enhancement of somatosensory and auditory cortical responses. In this research latency and amplitude of AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES (AMLR) are studied in BLINDS and normally sighted subjects.Materials and Methods: This descriptive-analytical study was performed on 40 congenitally BLINDS and 40 normally sighted subjects in the range of 14-20 years. All of cases had normal HEARING sensitivity and acoustic reflexes without any middle ear disorders. The reason of this age range is the maturation of AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES. Sampling was randomized.Results: There was significant difference between amplitude of Na, Pa & Nb waves and latency of Na while no significant difference between latency of Pa & Nb in BLINDS and normally sighted subjects.Conclusion: Increase of amplitude decrease of latency of AMLR in blind subjects was due to sensory compensation phenomenon, probably. It seems rate of processing and auditory perception in BLINDS is better than normally sighted subjects.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    MOHAMMADKHANI, GH., MOULA SADEGHI, AFSANEH, MAJIDI, H., JAAFARI, Z., ASAD MALAYERI, S., & JALAEI, SHOHREH. (2006). COMPARISON OF AMPLITUDE & LATENCY OF AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND NORMALLY SIGHTED SUBJECTS IN THE RANGE OF 14-20 YRS. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 64(1), 49-55. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38013/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    MOHAMMADKHANI GH., MOULA SADEGHI AFSANEH, MAJIDI H., JAAFARI Z., ASAD MALAYERI S., JALAEI SHOHREH. COMPARISON OF AMPLITUDE & LATENCY OF AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND NORMALLY SIGHTED SUBJECTS IN THE RANGE OF 14-20 YRS. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2006;64(1):49-55. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38013/en

    IEEE: Copy

    GH. MOHAMMADKHANI, AFSANEH MOULA SADEGHI, H. MAJIDI, Z. JAAFARI, S. ASAD MALAYERI, and SHOHREH JALAEI, “COMPARISON OF AMPLITUDE & LATENCY OF AUDITORY MIDDLE LATENCY RESPONSES IN CONGENITALLY BLIND AND NORMALLY SIGHTED SUBJECTS IN THE RANGE OF 14-20 YRS,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 49–55, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38013/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top