مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,166
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SURGICAL VAGINOPLASTY METHODS

Pages

  59-65

Abstract

 Background: To evaluate LONG-TERM OUTCOME and satisfaction of MacIndo surgery with and without amnion graft.Methods: This is a historical cohort study of patients who were treated with the McIndo procedure for vaginal agenesis. Participants answered a structured questionnaire to describe outcome in sexual function and satisfaction. Patient characteristics along with short and long-term endings were abstracted from the medical records.Results: Thirty-five patients responded to the questionnaire. Average age (±SD) at surgery was 28.4±3 years (range 17- 48 years). The mean number of years (±SD) since surgery was 7 years (range 2-12 years). In 15 patients (42.8%) amniotic graft were amniotic graft were used only in is patients (42.8%). There was no relation between two types of surgery (long-term outcome and satisfaction with p-values of 0.346 and 0.758 respectively).Conclusions: Since there was not a statistical difference between these two types of McIndo methods, it is recommended to apply the procedure in which amnion is not used. This procedure (without amnion graft), is an easier method with less operation time and reduced viral (HIV…) transmission.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    GHANBARI, Z., DAHAGHEIN, M., EFTEKHAR, T., DADYAR, M., & GHAFARNEZHAD, M.. (2006). A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SURGICAL VAGINOPLASTY METHODS. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), 64(6), 59-65. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/38021/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    GHANBARI Z., DAHAGHEIN M., EFTEKHAR T., DADYAR M., GHAFARNEZHAD M.. A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SURGICAL VAGINOPLASTY METHODS. TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ)[Internet]. 2006;64(6):59-65. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/38021/en

    IEEE: Copy

    Z. GHANBARI, M. DAHAGHEIN, T. EFTEKHAR, M. DADYAR, and M. GHAFARNEZHAD, “A COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO SURGICAL VAGINOPLASTY METHODS,” TEHRAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL JOURNAL (TUMJ), vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 59–65, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/38021/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button